|
May 13, 2008
Standardizing Fusion Test Reactors
In my recent post Starting A Fusion Program In Your Home Town I talked about expanding the fusion design and testing environment to increase the rate of progress in the development of a power producing reactor. The lead Bussard Fusion Reactor (BFR) experimenter, rnebel, has read that article and has chimed in here with his thoughts. One of the things we have been considering is selling a "turnkey" version of the WB-7. In this case we would design, build, license and deliver an operating Polywell, probably on the scale of the present machine. Operator training and tech support would also be part of the deal. The model is to use a plug and play concept where the user could substitute their own parts (electron sources, for instance) in an open architecture system. This is similar to what IBM did with the PC in the early 80s. It would give people who are interested in Polywells a chance to develop their own new patentable concepts and new companies without having to go through the entire learning curve that we have been on for the past several years. This struck us as a way to jumpstart the industry and get a lot of new ideas and people involved in Polywells. These devices could be funded through government grants (we have found a mechanism) or privately. I think we could do a turnkey machine for a ~ $500k-$1000k depending on how many people are interested. The idea would be for the government to make grants to institutions and then we would be able to competitively bid on providing the hardware. Ideally, I would like to see at least one Polywell in every Congressional district in the US. Since the cost is cheap, this is a tractable. Is this something you might be interested in?My reply went as follows: Sign me up.Any venture capital people who would like to start something - contact me. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 05.13.08 at 04:32 PM
Comments
aj, These are strictly test reactors suitable for research institutions that want to do fusion/plasma physics research. I'm thinking of a range of equipment. Everything from high schools to Universities. I have been looking at this field for the last year and a half and our level of ignorance is just astounding. Plasmas are hard because they are reactive. Apply an electric or magnetic force and the movement of the plasma affects that force. Equations and theory (which at the base are simple) can't take you to far because everything is moving and every movement affects every thing that is moving. This is one field where experiment will trump computation for a long time to come. Computation can be suggestive. It will never be definitive. M. Simon · May 14, 2008 12:33 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2008
April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The numbers are threatening
"Yes Thurston, those hillbillies are allowed to vote..." "unclean" thoughts Standardizing Fusion Test Reactors Gay murder scandal fails Coco's smell test! Riding The Tiger There Is Nothing False About Hope Burn Clinic In Iraq Needs Help "one of the consequences that scientists have long predicted" A Little Palate Cleansing
Links
Site Credits
|
|
First demo reactor must work with up-time stats and thorough and rigorous checking of all components for life-time maintenance issues.
My first thought for reactors was along similar lines: aim at the 'on-demand' generators now using natural gas. With good and demonsntrated low cost to operate and maintain with minimal consumables, these things should sell themselves into that market. These are the 'peak hour' generators that only kick in for limited times during the day and have problems being situated due to air quality concerns in metropolitan areas. The more automated the Polywells are the better the bargain they become, which includes the entire life-cycle maintenance regimen. With luck the first reactor will be run ragged with full power cycles and periods of continuous up-time and then more heavy cycling: make sure that everything we think we know actually works out the way we think. Those hard cycle numbers, from full shutdown to full output and back again are very, very important for non-continuous production and yet can start shifting that on-demand market away from petroleum resources.
I'm never going to be a VC on the big end, but investment? Yes. Show me the numbers and the target market.