|
|
|
May 04, 2008
McCain: gaining on Obama, slipping against Hillary
Not that this should suprise anyone, but here's the latest polling data from RealClearPolitics: General Election: McCain vs. ObamaAs I keep saying, if there is a Republican argument for Hillary based on strategy, I'm all ears. UPDATE: Dr. Helen quotes conservative comedian Julie Gorin who says (in part): "...we are faced with the real possibility of a second Clinton presidency."Hey, I'm not laughing! Adds Dr. Helen, The jokes are also humorous but honestly, I would rather just avoid another Clinton presidency altogether and let Clintonisms recede into the annals of history....I make no secret of my antipathy to the Clintons and the idea of returning them to the White House fills me with horror, fear, and loathing. But maybe I should look on the bright side. Maybe Clinton II will conflate the annals of history into the annals of comedy. posted by Eric on 05.04.08 at 03:23 PM
Comments
So, six months away from election day, McCain is ahead of Obama and trailing Hillary. Six months ago, Hillary was inevitable and Rudy was the presumptive challenger. Polls have many uses. Predicting elections more than two weeks in advance is not one of them. Joseph Sixpack · May 5, 2008 06:38 AM The Democrats cannot select Hillary without a huge number of Obama supporters feeling very strongly that the nomination was stolen by the party insiders, so they will select Obama, even if he's believed to be a loser in the general. They'd rather run the risk of losing this election, than risk losing their most loyal demographic. Hillary cannot win the nomination, so why not keep her hoping that she can? The longer she tries, the more damage she does. How's that for a strategy? MarkDD975 · May 5, 2008 07:52 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2008
April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• "pushed, not chosen"
• Conflating the crush of Rush (while avoiding the decontextualization of power imbalances...) • Obama Has A Friend That Can't Dance • "Exhibit No. 1" • Real Class Warfare • Yes you can walk through a card! • McCain: gaining on Obama, slipping against Hillary • Obama Strategist - We Want To Get Stuck • It doesn't matter who did it, because crime is senseless! (Therefore, the focus should be on guns!) • I Always Loved The Morse Code Opening
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I could be wrong however I do not believe the Democrat Party can afford to be Moveon.orged if they give the nomination to Clinton; if they could they would have gotten rid of Obama months ago.
In any case, I tired of hearing about what polls say since they change daily, that, and wneever a othe poll calls I would lie about everything, so much so that now I just don't bother answering my home phone.
Wonder what the polls would say if they asked how many people lie to the pollster?