|
March 20, 2008
SOFT SWAT (for kinder, gentler, wrong-house drug raids!)
In a recent Human Events piece -- "The Softer Side of SWAT," Brett Winterble complains about a plan to admit more females onto SWAT teams on the theory that male SWAT members "under-emphasize negotiating skills, patience, empathy and flexibility while over-emphasizing physical prowess and tactical acumen." ...isn't the whole point of a SWAT team to be a weapon to use when all else fails?OK, I could see his point if SWAT teams were used solely in such situations. But, while that may have been the case in the old days, it simply is not the case today. Far from it. Radley Balko has written extensively about the growing use of SWAT teams for routine police work -- especially to serve search warrants in drug cases: Over the last 25 years, America has seen a disturbing militarization of its civilian law enforcement, along with a dramatic and unsettling rise in the use of paramilitary police units (most commonly called Special Weapons and Tactics, or SWAT) for routine police work. The most common use of SWAT teams today is to serve narcotics warrants, usually with forced, unannounced entry into the home.And dogs, of course, the shooting of which is now routine. Dogs are being routinely purchased as a first line of defense against the invaders. If they want to go back to using SWAT teams for their original purpose that would be one thing. But if they continue to use them in routine police work at the cost of innocent human lives, I think that's an argument for disbanding their use altogether. "Softening" or feminizing them is only a half measure. posted by Eric on 03.20.08 at 06:09 PM
Comments
Anyone remember National Lampoons Vacation? At the end where Clark Griswold holds the park guard (John Candy) hostage with a BB gun and starts going around to the rides? A van full of cops show up in SWAT gear with M16s. Back then it was part of the comedy. Younger people who watch that today don't seem to get it because, well, of course they'd call the SWAT team in a situation like that. Sebastian · March 21, 2008 09:27 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2008
February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A bad year for change?
"Giraffes on Horseback Salads" Closing The Deal shameful MSM silence about latest addiction Not hell? SOFT SWAT (for kinder, gentler, wrong-house drug raids!) NAFTAGATE II -- Now it's her turn! "Now youse can't leave!"* The chickens that chickens produced? Liberation Theology
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Where are the semioticians when we need them? These teams look and act like SS storm troopers. Nice image American police are creating for themselves.
I assume the voters approve of all this drug war tyranny. As I said, nice image we're creating for ourselves.