A Strategic Error

I see a Republican landslide coming. McCain in the upper 50s.

In addition maybe the Ds will rethink their love for identity politics. It has not served them well.

I think McCains's "we win they lose" speaks to the American spirit. What have the Ds got? Hope and Change. BTW a poll I just saw shows Obama sinking like a stone in Ohio. Normally these things go slower. A few points a week. Obama is losing around a point a day. Given the fact that it takes about a month or two for the word to get out it is quite possible Obama will be in the 30s by convention time in late August. Right now he is in the mid 40s in Ohio. Down from a high water mark of 50 against McCain.

Republicans have done what every military commander hopes for. Get the other side in a position where they have no good options. What ever the Ds do now will piss off a large fraction of their voters. Obama has to get the nod to keep the party together. If Hillary gets the nod expect Black Conspiracy theories about how Whitey was 'ridin dirty' on the Black Man. Again. A humiliating loss by Obama will get them to attribute it to American racism. Especially Republican racism. A strategic error. The Dem party - which was united totally with victory assured - is now facing a defeat of staggering proportions. When it gets as bad as I envision there are negative coat tails. This has got to have party leaders shitting bricks.

They are now in a position where they cannot win with the black vote. Nor can they win without it. They are on the horns of a dilemma.

Successful operational maneuver can occur only in conjunction with a sound strategic counterpart. Successful maneuver at any level is derived from reserving options for yourself and denying them to your enemy. William Tecumseh Sherman would have called it putting your enemy on the horns of a dilemma, a philosophy which must transcend the battlefield.
Yep.

What is the basic fault line of Democrat politics? Identity politics. I don't know who conceived of getting the first major Black Candidate to run against the first major Woman Candidate, but it was a brilliant move for fracturing the Democrat coalition. Now I admit it wasn't a Republican idea. However, one of the rules of warfare is: If your enemy is making a mistake, don't interrupt them. In fact do every thing possible to encourage them. When it is too late for the enemy to change his dispositions bring in the heavy artillery. Cut them to sheds so that they lose unit cohesion. In military operations 10% casualties (in ordinary units) is all you need to destroy unit cohesion. The Romans called it decimation, so this is really old knowledge. I'd say similar numbers are effective in politics.

Obama still has the Rezko trial to get through. And we haven't even touched on Obama's Communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis. Or Liberation Theology. Or Black Liberation Theology.

November may not just be a tactical victory for Republicans, but also a strategic one. It will be very difficult for the Democrats to get the Party back together after this one. All the kings horses....

Cross Posted at Power and Control

posted by Simon on 03.19.08 at 09:23 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/6337






Comments

I don't see it. McCain has had everything break his way since January, and he's running even. Once the Democrats sort themselves out, there will be combined offensive against McCain. He's only doing so well because the media coverage is off his back.

There's still an unpopular President, and unpopular war (however well it's going) and bad economic news (whether or not we have a recession). All of this is bad for Republicans. And the Republican Congressional delegation hasn't helped.

So, I'm not optimistic. It's a long way to November. I'd love to be wrong, but I wouldn't call it for McCain just yet.

John Lynch   ·  March 19, 2008 09:55 PM

On the plus side, the Democrats haven't managed a majority of the popular vote since 1976 (50.1% for Jimmy Carter). They're running a liberal (Obama or the newly liberal Hillary Clinton) that resembles Mondale and Dukakis more than Bill Clinton. And Ross Perot isn't running.

So, maybe that will be enough. One can hope. But I'd like to see McCain's numbers consistently higher than the Democrat before I place any bets.

John Lynch   ·  March 19, 2008 09:58 PM

But Fred Thompson is already President in right wing fantasy land.

Will he and McCain share power after the election, or will Fred get Raptured?

alphie   ·  March 19, 2008 10:32 PM

Alphie,

As you know I have a lot of contacts with the Jewish community. My spies tell me they are breaking hard for McCain. That means votes and money.

It will be a few more weeks until the magnitude of the debacle becomes apparent.

So alphie - get back to me in a couple of weeks and tell me how well things are going for the Big O and the Dems.

I look forward to it.

M. Simon   ·  March 19, 2008 10:51 PM

Hold on. Two years ago it was all "Republicans can't loose" talk. Look what happened. Do not discount "white guilt" and young voters. I know young voters have not yet turned out in elections, but it might be different this time.
I am voting for McCain, even though that would make me a "racist" according to BO. I am a white male.

LYNNDH   ·  March 19, 2008 11:34 PM

I have several takes based upon comments left here. First of all, I do not see that McCain being even at this point in the game is a bad thing. Mainly because he is cursed with G.W.Bush hatred that has absolutely consumed the left and many moderates (also, be ready for the next Obama implosion coming to a TV near you!). I think he will be our next President, honestly. Second point, I personally think that Fred Thompson would be an awesome VP for McCain if he were younger...I can hear the geriatric jokes with a McCain/Thompson ticket now. McCain needs a young, conservative VP...maybe John Bohner from my home state of Ohio(?) As for the third issue...well, I am glad to hear that Jewish citizens may back a Republican candidate (although a very liberal one). I am, well, astonished that Jewish people support the left when they are the least supportive of Israel...and the right is staunchly supportive of that state. Actually, if anyone hs any insight on that, I would love to hear it. I have wondered that for years.
God Bless the US.

JPGR   ·  March 20, 2008 12:16 AM

Your spies must be the same rubes AIPAC hires M.

90% of American Jews vote for the Democrats...every single election.

alphie   ·  March 20, 2008 01:14 AM

Alphie...why is that? I mean, it's a fact I know, but what is behind the Jewish vote for leftists? I have literally wondered for years and no one can tell me (I am ashamed(?) to say that I am not close to any Jewish people...I know some, but they're not close friends I can ask such a thing). I personally see most liberals, not most Demcrats but liberals, as anti-Semite! I don't understand why that isn't obvious to all. What am I missing?

JPGR   ·  March 20, 2008 01:29 AM

I would think it has something to do with the phrase "Never Again," JPGR.

A party that giddily ships people they irrationally fear off to camps is only gonna get votes from the crazy Likudniks...a rather small minority here.

alphie   ·  March 20, 2008 01:46 AM

JPGR,

It is a historical thing. Republicans were not very friendly to Jews for a very long time. So Jews became Democrats.

Then, like religion, political affiliation is a family thing.

I have been talking to my mother (88) for a long time about that. I give her reason. It doesn't move her. We still love each other and wind up our conversations with "all politicians are crooks" and thus we end without rancor because in the end which crook you support is not a very big deal.

Any way my estimation is that Obama will drive 5% to 10% more Jews to the Rs. Of course a lot more will vote for an R this season than will change their political stripes. However, it may mean that in future elections both parties will be interested in the Jewish vote.

Obama in fact courted Jews by his strong verbal support for Israel in his speech about race so he must already feel the hemorrhaging. It is not just the votes. It is political donations and connections.

M. Simon   ·  March 20, 2008 06:01 AM

alphie,

Your insights into the Jewish community are astounding.

Are you Jewish? I never would have guessed.

M. Simon   ·  March 20, 2008 06:04 AM

On a more personal note my mother is very unhappy this election season. She is a yellow dog Democrat and would never, ever, ever, vote for Obama. She has had numerous black friends over the years and has always been an anti-racist. Her anti-racism is colorblind.

And she doesn't like Hillary much either.

I plan on asking her after the convention what her voting plans are.

M. Simon   ·  March 20, 2008 06:09 AM

White guilt would work better if Obama was a member of a vanilla church.

In any case white guilt seems to work best on upper middle class Democrats. Good for funding and the primary Not good enough to win the general election.

A lot of White guilt is absolved by the scourging of white America by the good Rev. Wright. After the beatings he has handed out a lot of white folks are going to feel a lot less guilty.

BTW if you look at the theology the Rev Wright follows it is not too different from Hitler's just substitute Black for German.

This will come out and make Obama even more unelectable.

You might want to check this out to start:

Spengler.

In fact when this election is done Liberal Nazis will be a very common understanding.

The bleeding has just begun.

The question on every one's mind will be: what did the Democrats know and when did they know it?

Obama is a Trojan horse for the Democrat Party. They just don't know it.

I'm comforted by the fact that the vetting on Obama has started several months before the work out on Kerry began. And the internet is bigger than it was in 2004.

Most amazing election season I have ever been involved in since '68. And I was a Democrat then.

M. Simon   ·  March 20, 2008 06:32 AM

"Obama is a Trojan horse for the Democrat Party. They just don't know it."

We'd all better hope they don't know it.

Eric Scheie   ·  March 20, 2008 09:51 AM

I've been saying since McCain became the front-runner that I am putting 20% odds on the party that loses this presidential election not being around in any significant form come the 2012 election.

Phelps   ·  March 20, 2008 12:14 PM

Jews 10% Republican? Well, click on my handle for some statistics from the 2004 election. Or maybe this URL will work:

http://entre_nous.typepad.com/entre_nous/2004/11/bush_voter_demo.html

Bottom line: Bush's share of the Jewish vote was more like 25%, not 10%. And among Orthodox Jews, he actually outpolled Kerry 2 to 1. (Among Reform Jews --- a denomination where rabbis routinely preach liberal dogma and pretend it's Judaism, one reason I switched synagogues --- Bush polled all of 5%.)

Former Belgian   ·  March 21, 2008 03:14 PM

Former Belgian,

I belong to one of those 5% congregations so the number was off the top of my head.

Thank you for the correction.

I can tell you the pain is palpable. After a hundred years of supporting black advancement to get repaid like this is a very deep hurt.

M. Simon   ·  March 21, 2008 03:25 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



March 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits