|
February 25, 2008
The savior and the she-devil
While I doubt it matters to any of the people in question, I don't especially like Louis Farrakhan's crackpot race-based view of Barack Obama: "This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better," he said. "This young man is capturing audiences of black and brown and red and yellow. If you look at Barack Obama's audiences and look at the effect of his words, those people are being transformed."If I were Obama, I'd tell Farrakhan to go pee up a rope while wearing his best suit. But being that this is politics, Obama will probably ignore him. Seriously, if we consider the context of Farrakhan's remarks, he's comparing Obama to a deity. The speech was delivered at the annual "Savior's Day" celebration, which commemorates the birth of Wallace Fard Muhammad -- a man believed by NOI members to be the incarnation of Allah, and who founded a religion based on the principle that all white men were created evil: Fard claimed that armageddon was imminent. His doctrine maintained that black people in America had a duty to discover their origins and purpose. Out of all the nations of the Earth, diasporic Africans, particularly those in "the hells of North America," were the only nation without any knowledge of their history, no control of their present lives, and without any guidance for their future. Black people had been systematically denied knowledge of their true history by their white oppressors. Christianity was a religion of the slave owners that had been forced on enslaved or subordinated Black peoples. He claimed that Islam was the original faith of Black people prior to slavery, and that the original peoples of the world were Black. He called white people a race of devils created by a scientist named Yakub on the island of Patmos. He also claimed that Black people were divine by nature, created by Allah from the dark substance of space, and that a spacecraft was waiting to destroy all white people when the appointed time came.In my humble opinion, Obama ought to take any comparison to the above crackpot as a personal insult. Or is this a "religious" issue? I don't know, but I'm thinking it might be a good time for Obama to set the record straight, and say a few words on the subject of the NOI generally. He might at least make it clear that is running for president, not Savior. (And certainly not Allah in human form.) As to what might constitute an equivalent endorsement for Hillary Clinton, I don't know, but I suspect that if someone as kooky as Farrakhan crawled out of the woodwork and endorsed her, she'd speak up -- her status as a blue-eyed she-devil notwithstanding. But as I say, it makes no difference what I think, because according to the rules of identity politics, blue-eyed devils are not allowed to speak about such matters. Things are getting pretty wacky out there. How long must we wait for the mother ship? When will the appointed time come? posted by Eric on 02.25.08 at 10:21 AM
Comments
One odd thing is that Obama is not particularly appealing to people brown, red, and yellow. It is black people and white (especially male) people who form his core voting constituency. Assistant Village Idiot · February 25, 2008 03:35 PM Didn't most of the tyrants, dictators, "dear leaders," czars and caesars end up fashioned into some sort of deity? When are we supposed to start bowing down?
Ronald · February 25, 2008 10:53 PM The thing is if he ignores Farrakhan, then he misses the perfect 'Sister Souljah' moment. That he ignores him means he doesn't recognize that being associated in any way with Farrakhan has some negative impact and saying *nothing* means he cannot get any guts mustered to say: Hey, I don't like what this guy has been preaching and want nothing to do with it. Bill Clinton had the timing for that and the guts to not only declaw a faction inside the Democratic party but also to silence many on the Right. Barack Obama doesn't realize that and silence will not only not stop his critics but will encourage others to believe that he cannot castigate extremism anywhere. An individual who cannot castigate extremists is not a savior.... he is Neville Chamberlain. Such grand ideas for 'peace in our time' and not doing a thing to stop that funny little man in Germany, and so sorry about the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. Any similarities of the Sudetenland, then, to Lebanon *now* is purely accidental, I'm sure. ajacksonian · February 26, 2008 10:48 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2008
January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
my context is not mine
"He got 3 votes!" The savior and the she-devil Hard core modest proposal Dead blogging the Oscars III If they're not racist, then they're sexist! And vice versa! Or both! Please not eight more years! Gypsy We Are In Need Desperate Hillary is stuck on silly
Links
Site Credits
|
|
One odd thing is that Obama is not particularly appealing to people brown, red, and yellow. It is black people and white (especially male) people who form his core voting constituency.