|
January 20, 2008
The biggest threat to affirmative action?
Today's Philadelphia Inquirer ran a report by Stephanie Simon of the LA Times about Ward Connerly's national campaign against affirmative action. DENVER - Intent on dismantling affirmative action, activists in five states have launched a coordinated drive to cut off tax dollars for programs that offer preferential treatment based on race or gender.Minorities? What does that mean? I realize that according to official theory, women are considered a minority, but they're in the majority so it doesn't make much sense. Considering the enormous progress women have made, affirmative action for women is nowhere near the hot-button topic that affirmative action for minorities is. Voicing opposition to affirmative action will cause one to run afoul of what Charles Krauthammer recently called ...a decades-long campaign of enforced political correctness by an alliance of white liberals and the black civil rights establishment intended to delegitimize and marginalize as racist any criticism of their post-civil-rights-era agenda.Yes, but people who raise principled arguments against affirmative action are much less likely to be called sexist -- especially by the alliance Krauthammer describes. Not too many people realize it (or if they do they're not willing to admit it), but the biggest threat right now to affirmative action -- and the fraudulent establishment that goes with it -- is Barack Obama. Ward Connerly understands this phenomenon inside and out. Affirmative action is part and parcel of the phony leftist narrative and the house of race cards on which the modern Democratic Party is built. Regardless of what position he takes on the issue (and I'm sure he's for it), Obama's very ethos undercuts the racist assumption that black people need help in order to succeed, and that only the condescending white liberal baby boomers can give it to them. So it's yet another reason that Obama threatens the narrative. I think the left understands what Ward Connerly understands, and they're wising up to the Obama threat. (Even if they don't dare admit it. What? You expect them to admit they think Obama is an aberration? A man who's "not really black" and who raises false hopes? Fat chance.) AFTERTHOUGHT: If McCain were to win the nomination and could reach across party lines to tap Obama as a running mate once the dust settles, I think Hillary would really be screwed. But that's just ideological utopian treason -- the sort of thing that can only find voice in the science fiction novels I don't read. Besides, who says that thoughts about defeating Hillary constitute utopian thinking? posted by Eric on 01.20.08 at 08:47 AM |
|
January 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2008
December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"In heaven, everything is fine"
The biggest threat to affirmative action? Ruining the narrative "Oprah is a traitor" South Carolina "But ya are in that chair!" Cyber Attacks On Power Generation noose that's fit to print? I Blame The Ludicrats The Judge Was A Marine
Links
Site Credits
|
|