|
October 31, 2007
HAPPY HALLOWEEN! (Especially for prudes....)
I never get any trick-or-treaters, but I always carve a jack-o-lantern anyway. Here's this year's: I can't help notice that there have been a lot of complaints about girls wearing slutty outfits like these, but because no one ever comes to the house, I have no way of evaluating slutty costume statistics. For some background, Glenn Reynolds links James Lileks who quotes from Newsweek: Witches are "wayward" and grammar-school pirates are "wenches." A girl isn't an Army cadet, she's a "Major Flirt," and who knew female firefighters wore fishnet stockings? Even Little Bo Peep comes with a corset, short skirt and lacy petticoat.To which Lileks responds, I kvetched about this a few years ago in my print incarnation, but for some odd reason one lone column did not stop the marketing juggernaut. I'll have to look into that.My advice is to start an alternative juggernaut. Why not try marketing deliberately prudish costumes as an alternative? I'm wondering, is such a thing possible? As to what they would look like, I don't know. Earlier Glenn said he was "OK on slutty," although not for nine year olds, but would anyone say they're "OK on prudish"? Do today's kids even know what the word "prude" means? What would a prude wear, anyway? Does anyone know? First, let's settle the nagging question of what is a prude -- at least, from the standpoint of a clueless girl: Dear Alice,Huh? That means all the kids who are worrying about being cool and fitting in are prudes? That can't be right. But there's more: The term is often used to judge someone as sexually conservative and no fun.Does that mean rape victims are prudes? Lesbians who rebuff heterosexual men? Gay men who refuse to have sex with women? This prudishness sounds more exciting than I thought. So what exactly would a girl who wanted to go out as a prude for Halloween wear, anyway? I found a goofy online "Are you a prude?" test which had a couple of images: Well, that looks downright Victorian to me. And while the Victorians were known for being prudish, today that look is considered "Gothic" -- and therefore cool and trendy! At least as trendy as the "elegant Gothic Lolita" look: And that's perverted right? So it wouldn't do for a youngster who's trying for the prude look. The test site also has this schoolgirl uniform: I guess that's prudish, but I see a problem right away with the prudishly strict school uniform thing. While the schoolgirl uniforms might be intended to be prudish, it's a well known fact that perverts in Japan (and probably here) get turned on by them. Which leads this sort of thing to be marketed: It's so slutty and disgusting that it ought to be illegal, right? Which is obviously why it's being marketed as a Halloween costume. But the problem is, it derives from prude wear! If yesterday's prude look becomes today's slutty look, I see no way for parents to win. I truly apologize for the fact that this became waaaay perverted. To think that I imagined I could write a modest proposal for prudish Halloween uniforms! I should probably stay the hell away from fashion and stick to pumpkins. posted by Eric on 10.31.07 at 08:17 PM
Comments
You may want to know the latest updates on the Israeli Sex Weapons of Zionist Aggresion Against Pious Muslim Males. http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/israeli-defense-force-elite-female-stripper-death-squads/ Scott · November 1, 2007 04:06 AM Burqa. PC and scary and prudish all at the same time. And the anti-costume PC crowd will be afraid to complain. In a lighter vein, how about a Miko's garb? LarryD · November 1, 2007 01:47 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
When skepticism becomes heresy
"Making a difference" Drew Carey On Medical Marijuana HAPPY HALLOWEEN! (Especially for prudes....) Forgotten threats from forgotten anonymous commenters mothers against move on! "Invincible" Hillary has bad night in Philadelphia Blog Radio Sex scandal, but which sex? moral collision course?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Pump Kins?
I can say no more.