|
August 30, 2007
"My name is Hsu! How do you do!"
By now almost everyone has seen the little Paw house on the left. It's the little house on the flight path. DALY CITY, Calif. -- One of the biggest sources of political donations to Hillary Rodham Clinton is a tiny, lime-green bungalow that lies under the flight path from San Francisco International Airport.Not surprisingly, the twists and turns of how this apparently modest family came to contribute so much money are not easy to follow, but the pattern looks familiar to experts, who suspect that the Paw family was a conduit for money which came from Norman Hsu -- a crook who fled to Hong Kong: Kent Cooper, a former disclosure official with the Federal Election Commission, said the two-year pattern of donations justifies a probe of possible violations of campaign-finance law, which forbid one person from reimbursing another to make contributions.There are too many red lights for me, and I apologize for the lengthy nature of this post, but I think the Hsu case merits attention, because it's only the latest example of what appears to be a clear pattern. An article yesterday elaborates: Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal reported that a modest home in a middle-class San Francisco suburb, where the family of mail carrier William Paw resides, is listed as the address for many contributions to the Clinton campaign. Mr. Hsu once listed the home as his address, according to public records, and the Paws' donations closely tracked his.So says Mr. Hsu. But is it believable? There's just something about a $49,000 a year mailman and his family having all this cash to contribute to a campaign that makes me skeptical. However, the claim is being made that Hsu "hired" the mailman's son. Campaign-finance reports filed with the Federal Election Commission list Mr. Hsu as a consultant with a company called Components Ltd.; a director of another called Next Components; a designer for Because Men's Clothes; and an independent apparel consultant.Hired to do what? What did he do? Winkle Paw explains that he has been "fortunate": In an email last night, one of the Paws' sons, Winkle, said he had sometimes been asked by Mr. Hsu to make contributions, and sometimes he himself had asked family members to donate. But he added: "I have been fortunate in my investments and all of my contributions have been my money."It's nice to be fortunate, and I don't doubt he has the cash flow. But who is behind the spigot and how does it work? In today's San Francisco Chronicle, there's a long story headlined "Democrats abandon fundraiser who turns out to be fugitive felon." The details of the story make it quite clear that Hsu is a crook who has fled back to his native Hong Kong. As to his his dealings with Winkle Paw, there are more red flags: Hillary Clinton and other Democrats scrambled to distance themselves from a big-name party fundraiser who was exposed Wednesday as a fugitive who disappeared 15 years ago after pleading no contest to felony grand theft in the Bay Area.Het wait a second! If Paw lives in California, how's he managing to work in New York? Bicoastal commuting isn't easy. But we are told that Winkle has "recently" been hired by the fleeing fugitive to "work" "for several of his New York apparel companies." Come on! No wonder candidates are returning the money. "When any contribution is called into question in any way by a credible source, it is the congresswoman's position to return the funds," said Lauren Smith, a spokeswoman for Matsui.Al Franken? Well, there's a guy with lots of experience at avoiding financial scandals. If he's sending his money back, that's a pretty strong clue that it's funny money. The presidential campaign intrigue descended upon the Paws' neatly kept, lime-green home in Daly City this week when it was revealed that the family had given more than $200,000 to Clinton and other Democratic candidates for national office in recent years, more money than high-profile donors like the Maloof family, owners of the Sacramento Kings basketball team, have given."Intrigue" is definitely the right word, for intrigue it is. If this story only involved the disappearing Hsu -- the crook Hillary never knew was a crook -- and a few people used as passthroughs to launder the campaign money, that would be one thing. In Hsu's case, of course the evidence is overwhelming that not only is he a crook, but he's a smoke-and-mirrors, now-you-see-it-now-you-don't specialist for whom money laundering would appear to be child's play: "Bundling is legal as long as everyone is contributing his own money," said Bob Stern, president of the nonpartisan Center for Governmental Studies. "But when one person supplies the money, that's money laundering, not bundling."Back to the title -- "Democrats abandon fundraiser who turns out to be fugitive felon." I'd like to offer a slight correction for the headline. "Democrats abandon another fundraiser who turns out to be fugitive felon." That's because (notwithstanding the complaint that the WSJ piece is a smear on Asians) this whole thing is so eerily reminiscent of the still unresolved Peter Paul affair that I initially was confused by the headline and thought that might be what it was about. The pattern is similar. Paul held a huge fundraiser, and was so chummy with Hillary that she regaled him with a tale of a blind date: Nothing wrong with being chummy with the guy. After all, the event raised a small fortune. But when the scandal broke, Paul became Mr. "Who"? because that was Hillary's response when asked about him. Lest anyone think this is a right wing conspiracy theory just because it involves Hillary, ABC News did a major expose of Paul and the Google video of it follows. (According to the caption, "Disney brass were coerced by Hillary to re-edit the piece the night before broadcast to take out all references to Hillary's finance director, David Rosen.")
Showed the check he wrote, Mr. Lee, says it was reimbursed by Peter Paul, exclaiming "I never had a hundred thousand dollars to donate to anybody!" I think it's kind of sad to drag a distinguished comics artist into a money laundering scheme when he ought to be enjoying his old age. But I guess that's politics as usual. The Peter Paul and Hillary stuff doesn't really stand out in the Wiki entry for Mr. Lee, but it does link a WaPo piece with a title that's a mouthful -- House Of Cards -- What do Cher, a Hollywood con man, a political rising star and an audacious felon have in common? Together they gave Bill and Hillary Clinton a night they'll never forget -- no matter how hard they may try. To read the details of how Stan Lee was inveigled into the mess, you have to skip to the last page of the article. It's long and complicated, but Paul (a convicted felon) wanted one of those pardons, he didn't get it, and he ended up skipping to Brazil, without much regard for Mr. Lee: In January 2001, the New York Senate 2000 Committee filed a report with the FEC stating that the Hollywood gala had been produced with in-kind contributions -- meaning goods and services, not cash -- of $401,419. The donor for $366,564 of that was listed as Stan Lee Media.Paul is of course a crook, and I don't blame Hillary for saying "Who?" The story of Paul with Bill and Hill is also quite amusing, but again, it's all on the last page of the WaPo story. Is that the upside down pyramid style of journalism? The boring stuff on top, and the good stuff lies at the bottom? Even truly great stuff -- like "Ain't No Mountain High Enough," and Bill Clinton crying over inaugural comings out: [Bill Clinton] sang along as Diana Ross belted out "Ain't No Mountain High Enough." He wiped away tears when Melissa Etheridge said that Clinton had brought such a spirit of openness to the land that she was inspired to announce during his inauguration festivities that she was gay.Crook though he is, Paul seems to be persistent in his attempts to get the false Hillary campaignn disclosure statements corrected (which explains the Stan Lee video). The Peter Paul scandal doesn't seem to want to go away, and in June Michelle Malkin wrote a post called "Hillary courts the X-men vote" which has another video. Right now, of course, the focus is on Hillary's latest abandoned fugitive felon fundraiser. Michelle Malkin had a post on that, and today she has a nostalgic post about Hillary's relationship with former fugitive donor Rehman Jinnah. Who? I hope this abandonment of fugitive felon fundraisers isn't a pattern. I mean, if I were a fugitive felon fundraiser, my feelings would be hurt! (All talk of "Castro's Dream Team" notwithstanding. Of course, if the Freepers are right, Castro isn't very fond of Peter Paul.) QUESTION: If the Hsu story is a smear against Asians, does that mean the Peter Paul story is a smear against elderly cartoonists? How far does identity politics go? UPDATE: Norman Hsu has also given (or directed) a lot of money to Pennsylvania Democrats. Governor Ed Rendell is keeping his $37K: one of Norman Hsu's biggest beneficiaries in the state, Gov. Rendell, said yesterday that he would keep the money - and stand by his friend - unless he learned more damaging information about the case.Rendell expressed skepticism over the claim that Hsu was a fugitive: Rendell received $37,866 from Hsu during 2005 and 2006, according to state campaign-finance records. Pennsylvania does not limit the size of contributions.I didn't realize he was "one of the most visible people in American politics," but I guess I wasn't paying attention. Recently elected U.S. Reps Joe Sestak and Patrick Murphy said they would return the Hsu contributions, but not those from Winkle Paw (described in the Inquirer as "an investor from Daly City, Calif., who has done business with Hsu.") Paw seems to know how to spread his money around. Business must be great! UPDATE: My thanks to Glenn Reynolds for the link. Welcome all! I made a few corrections in the above, and I guess here is as good a place as any to note commenter Bill Roper's complaint that I should have called Mr. Lee a writer and not an artist. (My ignorance about the comics field is obviously showing.) UPDATE (08/31/07): At 8:45 a.m. PDT, Norman Hsu surrendered to authorities in San Mateo, California. posted by Eric on 08.30.07 at 10:05 AM
Comments
I don't know, maybe the commenters are afraid of being hsued. (I'm just glad that someone got what I thought was an obvious reference to the Johnny Cash lyric. But I guess we're old.) Eric Scheie · August 30, 2007 10:19 PM The Peter Paul story is a slur against those who sometimes feel like a nut. triticale · August 31, 2007 01:07 AM So...the embarrassment of the politicians is all very entertaining! But it will be more enlightening to learn where the money comes from. Jim,MtnViewCA,USA · August 31, 2007 11:29 AM Ed Rendell, what a joke. His three point platform: Gambling, voter fraud and increased taxes! Someone needs to set Mickey Kaus straight that "Fast Eddie" is not even remotely viable as a presidential candidate. Pa doofus · August 31, 2007 12:28 PM By the way, Stan Lee is a noted comic book writer, not an artist. Other than that, you're right on. :) Bill Roper · August 31, 2007 12:28 PM Where are you getting this "fled to HK" stuff? The other asian guy who did this sort of thing to the other Clinton did run to China. But I thought Hsu was returning to Cali to face the music. Or has CNN been lying to me again? Nony Mouse · August 31, 2007 01:27 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2007
July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Carrying the closet too far
Yes, life is unfair. (It's why I blog.....) If you think government is fair, go to the grocery store and buy me a six-pack! House #2 visualizing whorled gays Murtha Sued Repetitively Redebunking the repetitively recycled "My name is Hsu! How do you do!" Flat Earth Climate Peak Oil?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Such a great title and no comments.
How about a "Man Named Hsu" ?
Or "Son of Hsu" ?
BTW does this go on on the Republican side (of course)? Probably just better at covering their tracks.