|
August 02, 2007
"Get the bike out of the house!"
Janet Powell, described as "a Philadelphia funeral director for 22 years," is calling for federal help in solving Philadelphia's homicide rate: "There's nobody taking care of the inner-city conditions in this country. It's almost as if it doesn't matter."Actually, the feds (in the form of the FBI) did help crack a recent triple homicide which occurred at a local bar. The gunman (an ex felon in illegal possession of a firearm who was related to one of the three victims) kept on firing in front of two dozen witnesses, yet no one saw anything happen! (One patron seems to have invented a story about how the gunman had lost a bet on a fight. As I observed, the details change, the narrative remains.) Other than help find the killers if they have jurisdiction, I'm not sure what the feds can do. I don't think it helps when local authorities consider it "devastating" that a triple murderer might have to go to prison for life. (I hate to sound heartless, but I consider it a relief.) Last weekend, 16 year old Luis Navarro was killed for a new dirt bike his mother had given him for his birthday. The story was on Monday's front page, headlined "Killed on the bike he loved." I don't think I'm the only person in the area who wants to see these crimes solved, and I wish there was more focus on solving them and locking up the perps, because it strikes me as basic logic that the people who commit the crimes are the primary cause of the crimes they commit. For whatever reason, that is not an idea shared by the powers that be around here. I was delighted to see that a suspect was arrested in the Navarro case. While news of the arrest didn't make the front page, it was a very thorough story, and it described how the suspect was caught: Chief Inspector Joseph Fox said that Smith did not know the victim and killed him Saturday evening because he wanted the teen's $3,000 Kawasaki motorcycle.The 16 year old suspect seems to have wanted more than just the bike, because if the report is correct, he went out of his way to deliberately shoot Luis Navarro to death: Smith, who has had run-ins with the police in the past, stopped Navarro at gunpoint, the chief said. Navarro tried to push the gun away, and Smith allegedly fired twice.What kind of parents would raise such heartless kid? you might be asking. I don't know, but if the mother's attitude is any indication, I'd speculate that maybe the parents just weren't very nice people, and that maybe the federal government wouldn't have been able to help much. To put it bluntly, mom seems to have been more interested in covering up the crime than anything else: He contrasted the help provided by the tipster with the actions of the mother of one of the youths "involved in this incident" who knew the cycle was in her house.If she said that to her son, it would not only constitute bad parenting, it would legally be obstruction of justice. I hope she is charged, and I hope Philadelphia's public officials don't try to spin it as another devastating tragedy for a family. Some people are bad. Why can't that be admitted? While the story of the arrest didn't make the front page, the mom's remark seems to be attracting a bit of interest as national news. An MSNBC headline reads "Police: Adult Told Teens To Get 'Dead Kid's' Bike Out Of House." As usual, these stories fuel the clamor for gun control, but what's conveniently overlooked never seems to merit press ink: the guns were illegal. While it was mentioned that triple-murder suspect Vonzell "Pooh" Roundtree "had three previous arrests for firearms and drug charges" and that "in 2002, he pleaded guilty to carrying firearms without a license and was sentenced to three years of probation," nowhere is it pointed out that by being a convicted felon he is subject to 24 hour a day stringent gun control measures. The mere possession of a gun by him is a felony. Likewise, 16 year old Eric Smith is also subject to gun control. He is not allowed to carry a gun because he is a minor. I'm not sure what "run-ins with the police in the past" might mean, but if he was adjudicated delinquent, he is also not allowed to possess a gun for that reason. Carrying a loaded weapon in public without a permit is also prohibited, as is carrying it in a vehicle. If his parents were felons and they possessed the gun, there are more gun crimes. In the midst of all the clamor that guns are the problem, why aren't these violations of the gun laws taken more seriously? As it is, they're not even being reported. It is beyond dispute that existing gun control laws aren't being obeyed by the people who are doing most of these shootings (or their mothers). The most obvious explanation is that criminals can't be expected to obey the law. I wish someone could explain to me how that's an argument for enlarging the class of criminals. MORE: To be fair, Philadelphia's next mayor, Michael Nutter, while a gun control proponent, at least makes the connection between felons and illegal gun possession: Nutter has watched in horror with the rest of Philadelphia at the skyrocketing murder rate. He thinks police should be able to stop and frisk known felons for weapons.Not only should felons not have guns, it is illegal -- another felony -- for them to have them. You'd almost think existing gun control laws were being kept secret. UPDATE: Via Pajamas Media, common sense from Friendly Fire: Is this really so hard to fathom? More criminals behind bars means fewer criminals on the streets. Fewer criminals on the streets means less crime.Tell it to Mayor Street, and Commissioner Johnson. posted by Eric on 08.02.07 at 08:40 AM |
|
August 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2007
July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Nostalgia is good for the constitution
A little cold war nostalgia Parody for profit of conservatism? Or profitable parody of conservatism? "environment-enhanced fatigue cracking"? "Get the bike out of the house!" The false flag that falsely flags itself After Pakistan Hillary has "political post-traumatic stress disorder" Laundering alimentary values Anticipating an epiphany (on behalf of "ordinary people")
Links
Site Credits
|
|