|
July 22, 2007
Creationized New Yorkisms
Not much to report from New York. The subway system proved to be so dysfunctional that I wasted hours trying to get around. As my luck would have it, yesterday they shut down several major lines for maintenance, and shifted trains to tracks belonging to other lines, while putting up incomprehensible signs like these: I don't know who wrote or designed ("created" is a better word) these absolutely fiendish signs, but what they do not tell you is that not only is there no 3 Train, but that the 2 train which replaces it might or might not run on the 2 Track (depending on the whim of the operator -- and unbeknownst to passengers, who would have to run up and down flights of stairs in the hope of locating the right track). Yesterday the 2 sometimes did run on the 2 Track, but mostly seemed to run on the Number 1 Track. Then, I learned that the 4 Train was sometimes running on the 2 route, but sometimes not and when the 2 train did run it was running on a route no one could figure out, and its movement and stations did not correspond to the electronic displays inside the train. Trying to figure any of this out logically was simply impossible. People were irate and one furious man told me that he rides the subway every day, and that this had never happened before. (I calmly asked whether he thought I should write a letter to Mayor Bloomberg, and this only seemed to make the man angrier.) The MTA employees were unable to predict or explain anything, and eventually it became clear to me that the trains were just being run in an opportunistic, make-up-the-route-as-you-go-along manner, and that in all probability, there was no system at all, and nothing was anyone's fault. I saw foreign tourists who were hopelessly confused, and I wouldn't blame them if they concluded that the evil empire was on its last legs. Speaking of signs, I had a great time at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, although I guess it's just as well that I missed the exhibit illustrated by this sign: Really and truly, I didn't know there was a plural of "feminism," and now I'm worried, because what are the implications for the other isms? Are we approaching a permanent state of priapistic pluralisms? (Or would that be pluralistic priapisms?) Are there now to be sexisms and racisms? Liberalisms and Conservatisms? Libertarianisms? Catholicisms, Episcopalianisms, Baptisms, Presbyterianisms? Where does it end? I just can't keep up with the pace of dysfunctionality, and I tended to identify with the turtle I photographed in the pond at the Brooklyn Botanical Garden next to the museum. I also enjoyed the Sacred Lotuses blooming in the water lilly pond: They have an interesting history: This is a symbol of the sun, of creation and rebirth. Because at night the flower closes and sinks underwater, at dawn it rises and opens again. According to one creation myth it was a giant lotus which first rose out of the watery chaos at the beginning of time. From this giant lotus the sun itself rose on the first day.Hey why not? I guess that's as good an explanation as any of the various creationisms. It's certainly better than any creation myth I could come up with for the New York subway signs! posted by Eric on 07.22.07 at 11:06 AM
Comments
You Ph.D. guys think you're so damned smart! :) Eric Scheie · July 22, 2007 10:32 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2007
June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"The country's problem"
brush with Dali Disempowering lateness The eye of the beholder Creationized New Yorkisms Fourth Class Porn Why I'm late -- AGAIN!!! Government bureaucrats can be such a pain! Respecting Tradition Censorship in Spain
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Global feminisms" of course refers to "a horse of a different color" feminism. When Dorothy finally made it to Oz--a triumph of feminism--she was introduced to a green horse. Which was, of course, the "horse of a different color."
Now, with Global Feminisms, we are being prepared for the day when Kirk returns to earth with green women. Or, for the non-trekkies, JarJar's bride. These "other" feminines will need to adhere to feminism while recognizing the imnportance of cultural diversities.
And since none of these wordses currently exist within the lexicons of the currents, we will have to do the introduces of these wordses now, rather than laters. (And you wondered where the patois of JarJar originateds?)