|
March 20, 2007
What If The Chinese Beat Us To It?
I have been obsessed the last couple of days with the Bussard Fusion Reactor. While reading around I have gotten the most depressing news. What if the Chinese get there first? Or the Russians. There is a lot of technical stuff in the article and Dr. Bussard talks about why raising funds is so hard. Then he gets down to his current situation. Bussard is getting discouraged.It will all depend on who owns the patents. Current grid structures with no magnetic shielding are about 98% transparent. Dr. Bussard says he has improved that by a factor of 100,000. That would make the losses in the range of 2E-6 much better than the expected requirement of 1E-4 or 1E-5. The critical thing to do now is to go ahead with the low power pulsed experiments with better instrumentation to verify the results and if that proves out go whole hog. Dr Bussard says that the full scale reactor will take 4 to 5 years to design and build. However, if a full scale reactor was run in a short pulse mode. Say 1 millisecond pulses once a second. Copper coils could probably do the job and test out the full scale reactor while the superconducting coils for actual power production were being contracted for and fabricated. For a 100MW reactor operating in a 1 millisecond per second pulsed mode the total power involved would be about 100 KW. Very tolerable for a system designed for full load operation at 100MW. Such a program would allow for faster evaluation and design changes before every thing is completed. It might allow for a full scale proof in much less than 5 years and possibly reduce the cost to $20 million to $50 million instead of the $200 million required to build a power plant. Once we know what to do we can pour on the coal (so to speak ) with higher cost but much lower risk. That is the big deal for every business. Managing risk. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 03.20.07 at 07:03 AM
Comments
Socrates · March 20, 2007 07:29 AM Cheap and low cost energy does change all of the equations on what is and is not viable... just remember that as a crony capitalist system heading towards fascism, China can get scads of energy and *still* collapse. It is not an energy problem they face, but an internal systemic collapse as there is no incentive to get high efficiency equipment in. China does not see the value in its people as a multilpier of activity, and so productivity remains stagnant. In the west productivity is king, and anything that offers more flexibility and capability to individuals to be more productive is multiplied by their productivity factor. The US, in particular, has been advancing in that realm faster than every other Nation on the planet for decades and that continues unabated. America transferring off the hydrocarbon energy base with more efficient energy production then multiplies its productivity and capability by its productive population. And as new devices and capability spread out into the population then entire Nation increases that by many fold. Remember that Russia got to space *first*. Didn't help them much as they didn't have the economy to properly deal with it. If China suddenly leaps forward and gets a 1950's economy, remember that the US starts at a 21st century economy and takes a huge leap forward as such things as riding lasers into orbit become feasible. Knock the energy cost to orbit under $1,000/lb and suddenly you have a whole Nation looking up and out for *themselves* if they want to go. China does not have the infrastructure for that... the US and Japan *do*. It is time to leave Rock 3 and head out from the cradle. That must be the goal for humanity: leave this place before the next mass extinction. If we can get cheap energy, then that day comes forward fast... very fast. Blindingly fast. China might get some nice bits and pieces, but the US and Japan as Nations will step forward. It isn't the energy question in China, its the infrastructure. They don't have it. We do. ajacksonian · March 20, 2007 06:00 PM ajacksonian, What bothers me about the Chinese (et. al.) is not them being the first to develop this. As you point out once it is done we can catch up in a few years. The problem is if they get patent protection. It may not hold us back permanently but it could certainly delay us. M. Simon · March 20, 2007 09:58 PM M. Simon, Jon Thompson · March 22, 2007 04:38 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"I Bet The NY Times will jump on this"
"slaughter" committed by "high caliber" "automatics" Balancing the polls Despite "dog overpopulation," there's a puppy shortage Squeezing Iran First they came for our elephants.... Hillary's favorite opponent? Allies Cheerfully Betrayed - In Advance From rampant slut culture to old-fashioned feminism? The Democrat Plan for Our New Army
Links
Site Credits
|
|
(bad html in post)
Should be:
... ">Bussard Fusion Reactor ...