|
March 14, 2007
Some things are more important than what we call "drive"
Via Tom Maguire (guest blogging at InstaPundit), my attention was directed to an interesting remark about Fred Thompson reported by Bill Hobbs: The Nashville City Paper interviews a couple of national political pundits who don't think Fred Thompson has the drive to become president - and notes that some Tennessee Republicans, such as U.S. Reps. Marsha Blackburn (R-Brentwood) and John J. Duncan Jr. (R-Knoxville), have endorsed former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for president.I think Thompson would be a great candidate, especially if Giuliani doesn't make it past the primary voters. Naturally, I'm curious to know what might have been meant by the word "drive" so I went to the source, which was Nashville's City Paper: Pundits, GOP insiders and organizers from Nashville to Washington, D.C. expressed excitement at the idea of a Thompson candidacy while noting the oftentimes maverick within his own party would have to find a "fire in the belly" which was not a hallmark of his previous days in politics.Well, they could have said the same thing about Eisenhower, who had to be drafted. But that doesn't mean Ike lacked drive (anyone who commanded the D-Day invasion could hardly be described that way); it might just mean a distaste for the egomania so closely associated with campaigning for high office. Frankly, I find it refreshing, and I think the country might do well to elect a president who is not "driven by politics." Whether the political system allows for such a possibility is another matter. The City Paper touched on another detail which might help account for what is being seen as a lack of drive: During his time in the Senate, Thompson was chairman of the Committee on Governmental Affairs and won landslides in both his initial campaign and his re-election bid.Well, he was Republican minority counsel during the hearings. I don't know whether that made him a "Watergate prosecutor" in the strict sense of the word, because there never was a formal impeachment, nor did he actually prosecute any of the people convicted in Watergate. But Thompson was certainly in the middle of everything and wrote a book about it: Thompson, the minority counsel in the Watergate investigation, wrote a book about the experience: "At That Point in Time: The Inside Story of the Senate Watergate Committee."Wikipedia says he's responsible for a famous question that still resonates every time the suffix "gate" attaches itself to a new scandal: He was the campaign manager for Senator Howard Baker's successful re-election campaign in 1972, which led to a close personal friendship with Baker, and he served as co-chief counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee in its investigation of the Watergate scandal, (1973-1974). He was responsible for Baker's asking one of the questions that is said to have led directly to the downfall of President Richard Nixon--"What did the President know, and when did he know it?"I would not be surprised to find that because Thompson is the equivalent of genuine combat veteran of the worst political war this country has seen in modern times, he has a different view of the process than your typical ego-driven, hard-charging political animal. The man has been in the arena and seen the worst of it. What appears to be an absence of drive might indicate the presence of something much more important and in generally short supply: political wisdom. I think Fred Thompson has sufficient political wisdom that he might be worthy of being drafted into service even if he expressed no interest in the office. posted by Eric on 03.14.07 at 09:13 AM
Comments
Thompson voted for McCain-Feingold. That disqualifies him from upholding and defending the Constitution. He'll get no vote from me. anonymous · March 14, 2007 07:51 PM I think the GOP is hungry for leadership right now. Is he the perfect candidate? Hell no, there's no such beast. We're at a watershed moment, and Thompson may be the right man at the right time - willing or not. Kevin · March 20, 2007 06:32 AM pregnant month belly http://ourl.org/pregnant_belly >pregnant holmes belly belly pregnant when · March 26, 2007 12:10 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Hillary's favorite opponent?
Allies Cheerfully Betrayed - In Advance From rampant slut culture to old-fashioned feminism? The Democrat Plan for Our New Army We will do nothing, because cowardice is virtuous Scientifically manufactured morality? Denial hits home See CO2? replacing tradition with tradition "REGARDLESS OF GLOBAL WARMING"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
When I close my eyes, I envision Thompson replacing Gonzalez as Art-Imitating-Life, or maybe stepping in for Cheney should Dick decide to spend more time with his family.