|
March 12, 2007
Cheney takes fall for Soros?
I'm questioning the timing of two recent events: According to papers filed with the SEC, in the fourth quarter of 2006 Soros purchased nearly 2 million shares of ... hold your breath ... Halliburton. The Halliburton shares reportedly went for an average purchase price of $31.30 a share. That puts Soros' total investment in Halliburton at around $62.6 million, or about 2 percent of his total portfolio. Halliburton Co., currently the largest military contractor in Iraq with billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts, announced Sunday that it was planning to move its CEO and corporate headquarters from Houston to Dubai, the United Arab Emirates. Much of the fuss over Halliburton's latest move involves Dick Cheney. But according to Wikipedia, while it is true that Cheney once was the company's CEO, his holdings now consist of "unexercised stock options at Halliburton, which have been valued at nearly $8 million." In other words, Soros's interest is nearly eight times Cheney's. So if we assume that Halliburton is being evil by moving to a sexist, anti-Semitic, and anti-gay country, can anyone tell me why Cheney is more guilty than Soros? posted by Eric on 03.12.07 at 03:20 PM
Comments
Do you suppose Soros helped manufacture the anti-Haliburton meme in order to drive the price down? Then he picks up a chunk and the campaign dies out except for a few "crazy" die hards. Instant profit. He has mastered "legal" stock manipulation. Do it indirectly. M. Simon · March 12, 2007 07:31 PM Soros bought 2 million shares of Halliburton (HAL). Halliburton has 999 million shares outstanding. Soros' investment is 1/5 of 1% of Halliburton's total shares, far too little to get him a seat or even a voice at the corporate table or to have any influence with management. Soros bought this stock because he hopes to make money on his investment; not to change, control, or run Halliburton. To be sure, it is an ironic purchase for Soros. Chocolatier · March 12, 2007 07:50 PM The Haliburton proposed move is baffling. First, given the ruction over the Dubai ports deal, why would they even consider such a move? I guess the point could be made that this war in Iraq is really a contractor's event. Given the fact that we're hiring so many civilian contractors, that so much money is being poured down the rathole of Haliburton, maybe they're positioning themselves outside the reach of investigators come the probable election of a Democrat president next year. Whatever the real reason, I'm not buying their explanation of tax savings. Frank · March 12, 2007 10:11 PM You're suspicious of a company's priorities when it moves offshore. Hey it's called profits. The priority of all companies is to make a profit. Hello it's me · March 12, 2007 11:27 PM Well, my initial reaction was to suspect profit as a motive, but my suspicions were distracted by the invocation of Cheney as the culprit. Typical analysis here: http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/1167/81/
I still suspect the company considers making money to be a higher priority than acting as an evil Cheney stooge. But millions apparently think otherwise! Eric Scheie · March 13, 2007 08:12 AM Chocolatier: Right, but people (of the clueless sort) commonly assert that Cheney is somehow horribly compromised by a far lower level of investment in Halliburton, which he also has no ability to control, change, or run, without time travel. Thus the comparison. (Re. the move itself, given that a lot of their business is in the Middle East, the way they're still incorporated in Delaware, they're not closing their Houston office and the timezone difference between their US HQ and that middle east area of operations, all make this look like a logical business move rather than anything nefarious, or even a (US) tax dodge. The usual suspects have already pronounced it vile and awful, of course. And as usual, they're wrong.) Sigivald · March 13, 2007 03:33 PM That this stock purchase comes from a man whose ideology excoriates hypocrisy as a mortal sin second only to racism is the greatest irony of all. S Wisnieski · March 13, 2007 07:05 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Anndrew Coulter?
Why they hate free speech Friday fun Meat denial is so old it seems canned! Climate Alchemy - Turning Hot Air Into Gold Looking at Doctors and Drugs Your local station and Al Gore don't want you to see this! maggots make me sick! Meaningless Sacrifice wholesome ghosts brought to life on YouTube
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Because Soros is Jewish, and who ever heard of a Jewish anti-semite?
....Oh.