|
July 06, 2006
Disarmed is out-sawed
New York subway incidents like this are in my view doing a pretty good job of making the case for right to carry laws: The victim of the subway power-saw attack says workers at the Manhattan station did nothing as a man sliced his chest open.I'm sure none of them are allowed to be armed. But if it's any consolation to the victim, New York's MTA workers are in a special, legally protected category -- as I noted just a few weeks ago, after the last subway mayhem spree. They've posted signs like this everywhere: Maybe the sign is working after all. After all, he only sawed through the chest of a passenger, and there were plenty of MTA employees around. I'm amazed that New Yorkers put up with such nonsense. Not that I have any illusions that they'll change their draconian gun laws or anything, but I think that if another Bernard Goetz came along, it might make a few of these psychos think twice. MORE: Tha arrested man, Tareytown Williams (an ex-convict who had earlier been seen holding a teddy bear) seems to be your typical angry street psychotic. Probably the type who walks around yelling at people all day as they tiptoe gingerly around him hoping he won't go ballistic on them. The MTA workers (who did nothing to intervene) are said to be traumatized: One MTA worker says the attack was a frightening scene for his colleagues.I can remember when people who behaved like rabid animals were locked up. Now, there are armies of activist bureaucrats almost singlemindedly devoted to making sure they're "free." Reform (in the sense of taking these people off the street) is impossible. What that means is that ordinary people who want to be safe can either arm themselves, or take their chances. What's interesting about this is that we wouldn't allow wild animals or rabid dogs to roam the subways. Why is that? posted by Eric on 07.06.06 at 04:38 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"After all, he only sawed through the chest of a passenger"
Having endured my share of unmotivated, arrogant, and just plain nasty transit workers, I can appreciate your cynicism. However, I do support the idea of increased penalties for attacking police, firefighters, bus drivers, and other people who perform a public service. In a very important sense, an assault on them is an assault on society. I'm old enough to remember when "progressives" were arguing that the penalty for raping a nun or murdering a priest should be no greater than for raping or murdering an ordinary citizen.