|
April 23, 2006
Mystery spy penetrates Philadelphia suburbs?
There's a saying that "all politics is local," but it never ceases to amaze me the way national issues can literally reach out and touch things in my own backyard. Since returning from California, I've tried to keep up with the Mary McCarthy CIA leak story (one of the big stories of the weekend according to Glenn Reynolds and knowledgable bloggers like Belmont Club and Tom Maguire.) Here's NRO's Andy McCarthy: There is no mention by the Post -- none -- that Mary McCarthy is a big Kerry campaign and Democratic Party contributor.What is this woman? A leaker or a campaign contributor? Not that I keep track of national issues as I should, but frankly, it surprised me to see that the spy in the center of all this national action actually took the time to contribute money to the campaign of [Philadelphia suburban] Congressman Curt Weldon's opponent, one Joe Sestak: The senior intelligence analyst who was fired Thursday by the CIA is a supporter of Democratic congressional candidate Joseph Sestak, which U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon’s campaign charged is further evidence that the former Navy admiral cannot be trusted on national security issues.As to McCarthy's motive for contributing to Weldon's opponent, it may be personal. Weldon's campaign suspects that McCarthy was out to discredit his book, Countdown to Terror (which involved the Able Danger allegations): Weldon officials also suspect McCarthy leaked information to the media last year in an attempt to debunk the congressman’s book, "Countdown to Terror," which is highly critical of the CIA. Weldon plans to call for a FBI investigation "to see what national security information she leaked and who she leaked it to," Puppio said.In his discussion of McCarthy's other contributions, Tom Maguire called them an "Impenetrable Mystery." Not that I'm penetrating any mysteries here, but why the hell is this Mary McCarthy messing around with elections in the Philadelphia suburbs? Why does she want to defeat Curt Weldon? Might it just be the Able Danger investigation? Or might this be evidence that she's a rogue operative? Sheesh. (You'd think the Democrats would lay low in these matters.) posted by Eric on 04.23.06 at 09:49 PM
Comments
What they also aren't reporting is that McCarthy might not be the leaker at all. Both her and her attorney have denied that she was the source of the leak. The odd part is that her firing was leaked and in that leak, they said she confessed. So that leak is not even true. It's impossible to really know who's being honest. Shawn · April 26, 2006 07:02 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Leaker or campaign donator?"
Exactly.