Some people, however, say that Glenn's website is silly. Indeed.

Silly? Indeed NOT!

Better not make such a remark about anything here!

;)

Yes, well ... But look at it this way. It's really hard to criticize Glenn, because his posts are so short. What is there to criticize? He links to an article, says something vague ... and then ends it with "Ha" or "Indeed." At least here, I get a bit of text with my Conservatism. And who doesn't like to read?

Read the whole thing.

Heh.

Indeed. That was a good post from Glenn. And a good reminder.

That's OK Glenn. They all suffer from this: http://home.comcast.net/~g2f/. The "Ein volk, Ayn Rand, Ein Fuhrer!" is priceless.

Glenn L.

I for one welcome our InstaMasters.

Ever since Neiwert accused me of having Nazi sympathies because I posted a cartoon of a U.S. soldier being stabbed in the back by "peace" activists, I've lost insterest in his schtick.

I imagine that if I next said I was a vegetarian, loved dogs, and was a frustrated art student, he's be even more convinced. %-)

again proving conservatives are not funny people.

Your satirical/sardomic look at the charge that the right is an organized dissent-silencing machine was not only lame but on a serious note, dead wrong.

Get over it. You're in an organized, hateful, dissent-silencing party whose minions will follow the party line like lemmings, and this year the party line is Iraq. Reynolds and the rest of you are following the leadership on Iraq like the little foot soldiers you are.

1. You're both hacks.
2. Stop trying to be funny, you're not.
3. Anyone who doesn't think the repubs actually want a one party state is clearly not familiar with Karl Rove or even Tom DeLay, and in that case, you don't deserve to even have this blog. Quit now.

Where would Rove and DeLay get their money were this a one party state? I doubt they'd trade in the lobbyist goodies for plain old tax dollars...

You're in an organized, hateful, dissent-silencing party whose minions will follow the party line like lemmings, and this year the party line is Iraq.

Release the hounds!

Hahahaha, poor candyyams.

"Your satirical/sardomic look at the charge that the right is an organized dissent-silencing machine was not only lame but on a serious note, dead wrong.

2. Stop trying to be funny, you're not."

Uh, who's the one lacking in a sense of humor here? You been drinking Neiwert's Koolaid?

"..You're in an organized, hateful, dissent-silencing party whose minions will follow the party line like lemmings..."

just a minute - I couldn't hear you - I have to go tell the "Democrats for Life" that are protesting outside to quiet down -

ROTFLMAO!

My god, the Left in this country is SO utterly pathetic!

Makes you wonder why the Democrats still exists as a political party.... Who in the hell would still vote for these clowns?

Candy,

Mary Cheney is a lesbian.

I thought you might want to know.

John Kerry.

..I have got to second the comment about the "Ein Volk" line; that one ALONE was worth my ISP fees for the year.

Best regards,
Mike Kozlowski

I knew there was something about that guy I didn't like. Maybe it was the hint of Mussolini scent that lingers.

And to think I blogrolled that guy...

"Ein volk, Ayn Rand, Ein Fuhrer, Einstapundit!"

Mr. Niewert: Pot, meet kettle. Amazing how easy it is to see the mote in the other guy's eye.

"2. Stop trying to be funny, you're not."

Very true. All the jokes and laughs come from the left anyways.

You're a sadistic beastialic necrophilliac (but that's just beating a dead horse)

Those blue blue eyes of the InstaNazi are oh so Aryan. I would like to measure his cranium to determine his heritage.

Now, back to my "organized, hateful, dissent-silencing blogging". My "lemmings" need to be led, and I have a my duty to fullfil as a "little foot soldier" in Bu$Hitler's Army of Amerikkka.

atlas shrugged, then farted.
it truly is the eponymy.

I understand that Dr Reynold's ultimate goal is the establishment of the "one person party state". He has a sub rosa alliance with Lileks, who cooperates enthusiastically.

hilarious! (that's code for all bow to the one party state!) if this is the level of paranoia in the left, I think the battle is over. (of course it's not paranoia if we're really out to get them. by the way, can I be an associate storm trooper, PLEASE?) :)

Don't you know that true Conservatives are poisonous to the touch?

Which, come to think of it, is probably a useful defense when confronted with the rabid barking moonbat.

unnamed above,

I am looking to hire associate storm troopers. You must pass the cranium test and be able to raise your right arm in the proper salute (no doubt you are already an expert in this). And I will not provide for your jackboots.

Actually, I want a half-party state, which people of my stature could dominate more easily.

"Glenn Reynolds" (if that IS his real name) is an anagram of "Adolf Hitler" -- and it's clearly deliberate. Given what we know about Reynoldshitler, we can safely assume that the INTENT is for it to be an anagram, although the actual letters have been changed to mask the intent. That perfidious bastard. I've got him over a barrel this time, and he knows it. "Eric", of course, is a similarly occulted anagram for "IROC", signalling his fascist devotion to the totalitarian one-party NASCAR circuit.

Another Suspicious Coincidence is the fact that the left's paranoid gibberish^W^W"legitimate concerns" about international capitalism do sort of line up rather well with Hitler's lunatic ravings^W^W"masterful and incisive critical analysis" on the subject... I suspect Reynoldshitler is behind that one too, in some subtle way that Neiwert hasn't yet "analyzed".

That post was as funny as a John Stewart "news" bit. Part satire, part substance, part naked partisanship and part narcissistic, assinine egotism.

Heh.

Paul,

I will not be your dancing monkey!!!

Jon (not John)

There's a party? Where? Can I go like this? Or do I have to dress up? Is it a cash bar? Because I don't have alot of cash. Can I bring my own? If this is the one party, I don't want to miss it. Do I need an invitation? Will there be women there? I mean, single women? Is there a band?

Eracus,

Of course there's a party. You ask where? Right here:

http://www.drudgereport.com/hkb.jpg

I thought you might want to know.

John Kerry

P.S. Did all you lemmings know Mary Cheney is a lesbian?

The Vast-Right-Wing-Conspiracy actually does exist you know. We're so sneaky in fact, that we have both the Neo-cons and their "opposition" in our pockets.

The opposition says only what we want it to say, and in this election cycle, we've been having lots of fun causing them to make complete fools of themselves.
This is called "The Bezerkly Projeckt" after that famous University in Kalifornia in which any rational objections to the ruling party are exaggerated to the extent that they cease to become credible.

All your blogs are belong to us!

All under the banner that bears the chilling slogan:

"The smaller the puppy, the smoother the shake!"

Did all you voters know that Kerry is a lemming?

Don't Kos and TPM have larger audiences than Reynolds? Why aren't they considered threats to democracy?

"3. Anyone who doesn't think the repubs actually want a one party state is clearly not familiar with Karl Rove or even Tom DeLay, and in that case, you don't deserve to even have this blog. Quit now. "

Hmm... Quit now. Nice to have an overt attempt to stifle dissent instead of this crypto-fascism of the Reynolds variety that seeks to influence the more-open-to-suggestion unconscious mind. Oh, he is a wily one, that Glenn. IF that's his real name. I suddenly have an inexplicably strong desire to veer away from this line of inquiry...

Hey,I wanna get MY cranium measured too!
Maybe we could be Aryan phrends, huh? And vote together?
C,mon...pleeeze. We wouldn't really need to hurt anybody. Speaking as a Regular guy, I don't favor "eliminationist" behavior...

Too funny, and thanks to Parker we got Puppies in the Blender. The diabolical professor is exposed for what he is. At last!

Candyyams why do you remind me of Sgt. Shultz?

One party state, or two parties that are in the same state? What's the difference? http://www.siglamag.com/features/0410/BushBashing.php

Who in the hell would still vote for these clowns?

Joanna, they vote for themselves ... and the inbreeding is starting to show.

John Kerry just sent me an insta-message as follows:

"... did you know that Mary Cheney is a lesbian?"

pippo

Now where did I leave my brown shirt?

Can I get me a hunting license here?

"Heh." (but said in a macho way, while leaning off balcony and jutting chin forward)

Misles said:

"atlas shrugged, then farted.
it truly is the eponymy."

Actually that was the Trey Parker / Matt Stone puppet version of "Atlas Shrugged".

Money line:
"Who the fuck is John fucking Galt?"

Forget about Mussolini. What about Bert? I hear he's a close personal friend of Glenn Reynolds.

bollocks, horseshit and gobshite.

The left has no moral foundation. In fact, they have an amoral foundation, or even an immoral foundation. They should be attacked and discredited in the universities, especially the education departments.

party on.

Intimidation campaigns and psychological warfare? Hey, it could be worse. Neiwert could have accused Reynolds of being . . . Tom Sawyer. According to novelist George Saunders:

"Let's think of this [election] in terms of Huck Finn. Huck [Kerry] is generous, concerned about the suffering of others, generally pleased with life, and interested in it. Tom Sawyer, on the other hand, is obsessed with a highly conceptualized view of the world, and imposing this view on others (the Sunday school picnic, Huck, Jim), regardless of how this imposition might actually affect them. Huck is bold, curious, flexible. Tom is, at heart, afraid of the world, suspicious, ego-driven, incurious, and rigid. Our nation is engaged in a struggle to decide if it is going to be the United States of Tom or the United States of Huck."

Candyyams is onto us. He must be liquidated before he decodes the message on the dollar bill, or finds the hidden wing of the Library of Congress.

Maybe we can get by with just a brain-wipe and personality implant. Candyyams, are you free on Thursday?

Now that's quite enough.

In my last secret email to all minions I specifically mentioned that the first rule of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is that we don't talk about the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Tell Reynolds I'll deal with him later. I've got to secretly communicate to the President through this great little device the CIA whipped up for us during the debates.

Dammit, I can't get these brown shirts to coordinate with my Peanuts pajamas. Anyone got any ideas?

The first rule of the VRWC is
you don't talk about the VRWC !

I'm all for a two-party system. It just happens to be more important that neither party be as left-wing as either current party.

wow ... I haven't had this much fun
since I played "Illuminati" years
ago.

Two words show that the Left
has no sense of humor: Jimmy Carter

Dude! How! About! Using! Some! More! Exclamation! Points!

Maybe there is an actual argument in this post, but I can't hear it with all the yelling.

Cripes.

Part satire, part substance, part naked partisanship and part narcissistic, assinine egotism.

You Called?

Only "PART narcissistic, assinine egotism"?

I thought that part was my whole whole!

And what's with trying to make a narcissistic, asinine egotist get rid of exclamations, anyway? Isn't that a form of "eliminationist rhetoric?"

Poor Candyyams. To be so dumb. Hopefully, it's young, with many decades of brain teasers and I.Q. building exercises ahead of it. Who knows? One day it might even be human.

Excellent post, Eric. Beautiful humor, perfectly done.

You lemmings should go to Neiwert's site and read his "Rush, Newspeak and the Rise of Fascism." It's pretty unequivocal, what the right is doing, and David's exegesis is really quite good. We in the reality-based community think highly of it. Your mileage may vary.

Oooooh, he used exegesis in a sentence!
I'll bet he reads The Economist! I am so very impressed, let me tell you! He must be terribly, hugely intelligent! And Eric, didn't I warn you a year ago about exclamation mark abuse? When you said it was fun, and I should try it? I guess you were right! IT IS FUN!! Now I must march into the sea with my furry retarded brethren.

My god, the Left in this country is SO utterly pathetic!

Makes you wonder why the Democrats still exists as a political party.... Who in the hell would still vote for these clowns?

the rabid barking moonbat.

The left has no moral foundation. In fact, they have an amoral foundation, or even an immoral foundation.

It just happens to be more important that neither party be as left-wing as either current party.

Ha ha ha.
Ha ha ha ha.
Ha ha....

Welcome to the reality-based community.

Regarding the Democrats and their charges against conservatives: As we used to say in elementary school -"The smeller's the feller".

"The smeller's the feller."

Well, damn. You got us there. That's just... what can a guy say to something like that? The raw power and might of such an argument has surely never been seen before in all the history of the Intrawebs.

BUT, can you prove it DIDN'T happen? Eh? Hah!

Ummm, maybe you should actually read Neiwert's whole article (I know it's long, but I'll be happy to help with the big words...)

hint...ITS NOT ABOUT GLENN REYNOLDS!

Oh, you and your small, pointless lives. I enjoy watching the little pipple, with your monkey dancing ways, struggling childlike in futility against your fate (to fetch and carry for me).

You minions will worship me when I rule this land of idiots through what's-his-name, Lurch.

/PS don't think that uppity millworker's son will be setting foot in *my* house once I'm running things, either.

Wow. I have now found the stupidest pseudo-conservative blogger on the planet.

"Classical values" eh? Buggery you mean? Slavery? Oligarchy? (No wonder you like Bush.)

The thing about Dave Neiwert is: he deals with facts. His opinions and suppositions are based on facts.

Since your opinions concern his opinion, your opinions are based on opinion. Where does that leave you?

Ah, the cry of the truly intellectually impotent: "My opinion is that your opinion is worthless." Followed by ad hominem attacks, but no analysis of the case presented by the offending opinion.

What's wrong with so-called "conservatives" like you? Are you afraid to actually engage in the argument?

Why don't you tally up incidents of right wing violence vs. left wing violence and see which column hold more reported incidents? How about trying to find a DA who refused to prosecute a liberal caught on video assaulting a conservative? (A right-wing fantasy, but the opposite case does exist.)

As for the one-party state, I've read your stuff: it's clerly what you'd like as well, though you are far too cowardly and intellectually dishonest to admit it.

After all, what are you really after when all you do is demonize "the other side" and fail to engage in argument?

Answer: quashing dissent through force, rather than winning with the better argument.

Of course, if you don't have the better argument, then your only hope for victory is...

Well, you know the answer to that. If you possess "classical vales," then you're right in line with genocide, eh?

"After all, what are you really after when all you do is demonize "the other side" and fail to engage in argument?

Answer: quashing dissent through force, rather than winning with the better argument.

Of course, if you don't have the better argument, then your only hope for victory is...

Well, you know the answer to that. If you possess "classical vales," then you're right in line with genocide, eh?"

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Don't skirt the issue. He's right, and you know. Fancy one-liners will only save the Neoconservative movement for so long.

I'm not sure about the trains, but scuttlebutt has it that Glenn *does* do a decent job at fixing big horse races. Funny Cide? Smarty Jones? Victims of Glenn.

Really, as a horse-racing buff, I should investigate that rumor more thoroughly...

I'm glad you got another Instalanche. Once again, superb _style_ you have. Classical Values.

You wingers are all bs talk and no real action. Weak and immature.
Everytime you open your mouths you prove our talking points.
Go for it girls.