|
September 02, 2004
Laphamizing "race"
It looks as if the Lapham school of journalism has twice decided Arnold Schwarzenegger was a liar before the uncooperative transcripts of his speeches dared to refuse to reflect the Laphamized lies he was supposed to have told! TWICE! Once on Tuesday night -- and once last year! This has even created a battle between MSM outfits (and apparently within CNN itself) as they labor to come up with, or at least define the context of the "lie." Worth a debate? CNN misquotes Schwarzenegger on '68 remarksYou'd think it would be a fairly simple matter to determine whether Arnold said "race" or "debate." The problem is that this canard -- that Arnold is a "liar" for saying that he listened to the 1968 Nixon-Humphrey "debate" -- is over a year old: Or Maybe It Was Laugh-In? The L.A. Times debunks Austrian Ah-nuld's story about how he decided to become a Republican in 1968 after listening to a friend translate the Nixon-Humphrey debate. There was no Nixon-Humphrey debate.Well, one sentence in both accounts is true; Nixon managed to avoid an actual, one-on-one, timed, moderated debate with Humphrey. But, although I was only 14 at the time, I am here to tell you that there was definitely a race! And, lo and behold, Nixon and Humphrey disagreed! On a lot of issues! Imagine that! An election for president, which involved a race! And a contested race at that! Where exactly did Arnold use the word "debate"? Here's the transcript of what he said on August 31, 2004: As a kid I saw the socialist country that Austria became after the Soviets left. Now, don't misunderstand me, I love Austria, and I love the Austrian people. And here's the transcript of a very similar speech in September of 2003: In 1956, the Soviet tanks crushed the uprising next door in Hungary. Hungarian people by the thousands fled across the border into Austria. I saw what communism did to those people. When I was nine, I helped my father in the refugee camps. I ladled soup out to the children.Imagine! That lying bastard! Twice in a year, Arnold has refused to admit to the truth! How dare his words refuse to reflect his lies? And now he hides behind the "race" card! Is there no low below which these dastardly Republicans won't stoop? UPDATE: Kos has joined the chorus in calling Arnold Schwarzenegger a liar ("liernator" is just too clever!), but, quite inexplicably, he quotes Arnold using the word "race" -- following which he says there was no Nixon-Humphrey "debate." Wouldn't Kos have made his point better had he said there was no Nixon-Humphrey race? (Via Atrios, who also believes that "race" and "debate" are synonyms.) MORE: The most puzzling thing about this whole flap is that if you assume Arnold made up the story of his conversion to Republicanism, why would he select the evil Nixon as his savior in the first place (much less repeat it for years)? Even the lowest paid political speechwriters would not have dared select Nixon! posted by Eric on 09.02.04 at 07:29 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1370 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Laphamizing "race":
» "NEWS" from one of the Two Americas. Guess which one. from Who Tends the Fires
The Word for the Day is: "Gilligan's Candidate" It's getting harder to find a good news story to go with the Word for the Day. Kerry needs to come out of media seclusion so we can pick on him more... [Read More] Tracked on September 6, 2004 03:32 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I admire Schwartzenegger for openly admiring Nixon. And I agree: Get government off our backs, out of our wallets, and out of our privates (i.e., Holy Tribadism). And onto the backs of our country's enemies (i.e., War).