|
March 06, 2007
My own private Kilimanjaro
There's been altogether too much denial and screwing around on this blog, and I think it's high time I took things more seriously. I therefore intend to deal head-on with what Al Gore calls the "most important moral, ethical, spiritual and political issue humankind has ever faced." It's about time, isn't it? My denial ends -- and my science begins -- right here and now, with this blog post! We've all heard that all politics is local and we've all heard that we're supposed to, you know, "THINK GLOBALLY, ACT LOCALLY." Well, since weather is politics, and politics is weather, the same local and global rules apply. All weather is local -- starting right here! On Friday, the temperature here rose sharply -- reaching the mid 50s. As the snow melted, I thought to document the peculiar phenomenon: This was one of the last patches of receding snow in my yard, as it looked on Friday: And here's exactly the same spot on Saturday -- taken moments before it disappeared forever: Yes, I do mean forever. Those flakes (which by then had become crystalline structures clinging precariously to the ground as if for their very lives!) have literally disappeared. Never to return again. I was so upset by the implications of this that I prepared my own scientific chart to document the ominous spike in temperatures. Here it is, as submitted it for peer review:
However, that is not what happened. Instead, a bizarre invasion of arctic air (doubtless caused by the ushering in of the new ice age triggered by the Notorious Shutdown Of The Atlantic Conveyor Belt System) has swept into the area: Arctic air, accompanied by snow squalls and strong wind gusts, is sweeping into the Northeast this afternoon. The bone-chilling invasion is setting the stage for dangerously cold wind chills later tonight and early tomorrow. Wind chills in northern New York state and northern New England may tumble to 40 below zero by sunrise. In eastern Massachusetts, including Boston, wind chill factors could plunge to 15 or 20 below. Even around NYC, wind chills are expected to fall below zero. Frost bite can occur rapidly in such conditions, and residents of the Northeast, especially north of the Mason-Dixon Line, are advised to dress for extremely cold conditions tonight and tomorrow morning.Right now it's a bitterly cold 14 degrees. Coco was hesitant to go outside and do her business. Let's see.... From the mid 50s to the mid teens in a two day period is also a very ominous phenomenon. This called for another carefully prepared, scientifically peer-reviewed graph, which I assure my readers was prepared with state of the art methods.
Zero degrees Kelvin, of course is "absolute zero" -- "the temperature at which all molecules stop all movement." All molecules will stop all movement? Gee, that sounds awful. That means my computer probably won't work anymore, and I'd have a major problem writing this blog! Of course, according to certain scientific skeptics (the ones whose opinions Al Gore doesn't think should be reported), my modeling might be off a little: Formerly of University College London, Dr. Orrell is best known among scientists for arguing that the failures of weather forecasting are not due to chaotic effects -- as in the butterfly that causes the hurricane -- but to errors of modelling. He sees the same problems in the predictions of the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which he calls "extremely vague," and says there is no scientific reason to think the climate is more predictable than the weather.I blame the gods. I'm sorry folks! I know that this is "the most important moral, ethical, spiritual and political issue humankind has ever faced," but my hockey stick got stuck in the conveyor belt. I'll try to lead a more virtuous life in the future. posted by Eric on 03.06.07 at 08:42 AM
Comments
That's right, ridicule science! Your dishonest comment typifies the right wing! And even if you were right it would make no difference, because my data shows a 100% correlation with the overwhelming scientific consensus -- which is that all increases as well as descreases in temperatures are caused by global warming! Eric Scheie · March 6, 2007 03:37 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide
I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints Guilty!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
After careful analysis of your facts and figures, I have concluded with a high degree of confidence that your second graph is simply your first graph turned upside down.
Further reflection suggests, with a lower but still high degree of confidence, that if you turn your graph sideways, you find that future weather will not change dramatically. As a refinement of this conclusion, I suggest that, when turning the first graph sideways, you should do it counterclockise if you prefer the beach, but clockwise if you enjoy skiing.