|
March 01, 2007
sublimating my rationalizations on a nonexistent day
My whole ambition in the pictorial domain is to materialize the images of my concrete irrationality with the most imperialist fury of precision... Today is March 1 -- a strange day for several reasons. According to Wikipedia, today is the first day of Spring in Denmark, while in Australia, today is the first day of Fall. Moreover, today is Day One in the old Roman New Year -- a fact which has left its historical residue depending on how we count days: If one begins each year on March 1, till the next March 1, then each date will have the same day number in this year, regardless of whether it is a leap year or not (e.g. December 25 is always day 300), unlike counting from January 1. This is due to the fact that the Gregorian and Julian calendars are based on the old Roman Calendar, which had March 1 as the first day of the year. The addition of the leap day of February 29 (which is what causes the days of leap years to fall on different day numbers) is a continuation of the February placement of the old Roman calendar's Mensis Intercalaris (a shortened extra month inserted to bring the 355 day long calendar into rough alignment with the seasons).That's enough to drive anyone crazy. What I'm trying to figure out is why the day does not appear on my calendar. What? You don't believe me? Check out the photograph I just took: While the easiest explanation for the disappearance of March 1 is that a simple misprint occurred, I'm not so sure, because this is the official Salvador Dali calendar. Considering the following: I know this doesn't prove that there's any significance to today's missing date, but considering its importance, I suspect cosmic significance of some sort. Whether this cosmic significance is accidental or deliberate is beside the point. I think Dali would agree. Consider Dali on mistakes: Mistakes are almost always of a sacred nature. Never try to correct them. On the contrary: rationalize them, understand them thoroughly. After that, it will be possible for you to sublimate them.Far be it from me to correct the sacred. What to do on a missing date which will live in mistakenly unmistakable cosmic significance? I think I'll try to rationalize the sublime, and sublimate the rational. MYSTERY DISAPPEARANCE UNRAVELS AS IT DEEPENS: In another amazing "coincidence," it was on March 1 that Dali's depiction of the crucifixion (which he had done for the Rikers Island jail) disappeared. As it turned out, it was stolen by prison guards and officials. Interestingly, Dali intended it for the prisoners' dining room so that prisoners could appreciate it, and dedicated it for that stated purpose in writing. Jail officials moved it to the prison lobby, to which inmates had no access, and from where it was stolen: The drawing, a surrealist image of Jesus being crucified, hung in the prison cafeteria for years before being moved to a lobby where officials thought it would be safer.Who knew? Dali knew, that's who! That's why he wrote on the dedication -- right on the painting -- that it was for the prisoners' dining room, dummy! Here's a picture of the missing work: (Link via Wired New York Forum, which has a detailed article on the case.) It's tough to read the inscription in that picture, but according to the BBC it read as follows: "For the dinning room of the Prisoners Rikers Ysland [sic] - SD".That's certainly typical of Dali's mangled way of writing in English, but the sincerity of his message is obvious. The crucifixion is still missing, and I think it's appropriate that March 1 is missing from the calendar. It's as if Dali having the last laugh. At disobedient bureaucrats, and malignant prison officials. While there have been a couple of convictions for the theft, according to the testimony, the main culprit seems to have been the assistant deputy warden, who was acquitted: A former Rikers Island assistant deputy warden has been acquitted of charges that he masterminded the theft of a $250,000 Salvador Dali sketch from the prison.Former Assistant Deputy Warden Nuzzo did sue to get his job back, but he lost. Here's what the appellate court said in rejecting Nuzzo's appeal: Respondent's findings that petitioner took property from its facility at Rikers Island without proper authorization, provided false entries on his work time sheets and then provided misleading testimony during his official interview are supported by substantial evidenceHmmmm.... From a legal standpoint, I wonder whether the fact that the findings were supported by substantial evidence means that it's not defamatory to say they're true. (Would it be defamatory to say that OJ killed Nicole, for example, because of a civil jury's findings?) I'm more concerned with the destruction of art than with theft. Stolen property can always be returned. Destruction of art might not be a crime against humanity in the legal sense, but I think it's a crime against culture -- something IMO morally worse than theft. posted by Eric on 03.01.07 at 12:29 PM
Comments
In the case of engineers, maybe avoided entirely? Eric Scheie · March 1, 2007 05:15 PM "My whole ambition in the pictorial domain is to materialize the images of my concrete irrationality with the most imperialist fury of precision..." Frank · March 3, 2007 12:19 AM Haven't seen it, but I will! I will venture that had Hitler become the graphic artist he originally wanted to be instead of a politician, millions of lives might have been spared. Eric Scheie · March 3, 2007 09:07 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Rapid Social Change
School of hard knocks I'd rather be watching South Park (No seriously!) China Has Problems Balance is Bias War Stories sublimating my rationalizations on a nonexistent day Rating my filth Why hypocrisy shouldn't -- but does -- matter New Vistas
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Mistakes are almost always of a sacred nature. Never try to correct them. On the contrary: rationalize them, understand them thoroughly. After that, it will be possible for you to sublimate them.
Which is why Dali was an artist not an engineer. Mistakes for engineers are great learning opportinites. However, they are also to be corrected.