|
February 21, 2007
(I should probably never say never)
Pajamas Media has a fantastic piece by Buzz Aldrin and Taylor Dinerman about man's return to the moon. Aldrin begins: On my last trip to the moon I didn't get to stay the whole day and had to share my accommodations with another man. If I could go back, I would expect not only a larger room, but a longer moment to gaze at the stars and the cloudy blue ball that should only be mankind's starter home.Read it all. There are a lot of reasons why it's long overdue to return to the moon, including the construction of a permanent station there (the details are there), harvesting energy ("lunar solar power beamed directly from the Moon to the Earth's surface"), and something I consider of paramount importance to the future of space exploration: An American moon base would insure that traditional American ideas such as private property and homesteading would influence the future legal regime. Otherwise the Europeans and others might try and push their model of tight government control and high taxes onto the off-Earth economy of the late 21st century. Such an environment would stifle the creative endeavors not only of American entrepreneurs such as space ship one financed by Paul Allen, built by Burt Rutan, that forms the basis for Virgin Galactic's suborbital space tourism project.I won't live to see it, but I hate the idea of man continuing to be stuck on one planet when things like survival -- and destiny -- are at stake. It's a crying shame this wasn't done before now, but I'm glad to see that it will happen. True, I might not live to see it, but that does not mean I can't support it anyway. posted by Eric on 02.21.07 at 01:42 PM
Comments
All the Gerard K. O'Neill plan ever needed was backers... lots of money in 1969-70 terms, yes. The basic physics and how to make it work economically has been done to orbit with small lunar station for orbital manufacturing plants. Today, of course, we will boldly go forth with technology first pioneered at the beginning of last century! I am so very glad that this didn't happen earlier when the true experts were around... saved the world, that. Yes, get rid of the majority of the drag, put on some boost and in no time at all you are in orbit. ajacksonian · February 23, 2007 12:25 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2007
January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Warning: your constitutional rights might depend on your race!
Going to court is so gay! "homosexual activist"? comment provocateur? Or sock puppet seeking help? The Worst Job in America accessories to fit the official enclownment "Saddam Hussein Hayek" finally sees the light Outside the Wire (I should probably never say never) Please don't make me refrain! Duke And The Cultural Marxist Program
Links
Site Credits
|
|
There are actually a few other good reasons to go back. One is that we could only construct a particle accelerator large enough to answer the big questions of particle physics on the moon. Another is the richness of Lunar soil when it comes to Helium 3, which might be mined to provide for our mobile energy needs.
Regardless of the particulars, however, I think that long-term investment and research are essential activities of government, and establishing extraterrestrial bases of activity is high on the list of things we ought to be doing and are not.