|
December 25, 2006
Treachery
Cale Hahn at Israpundit is going on about American relations with Israel. He thinks America is being a treacherous ally. Especially the ISG (Iraq Study Group - James Baker leading the charge.) In regards to Israel, the ISG report states, "The US will not be able to achieve its goals in the Middle East unless the US deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict." Such a statement makes one wonder how many divisions Israel has operating in Iraq and Arab countries.He contines in the same vein: Immediately following the publishing of the ISG report, several disturbing events occurred:I beg to differ. I think the Israeli treachery is staggering. Here is why:-James Baker proposed a US-organized conference dubbed Madrid-2, promoted as a forum to discuss Iraq but will actually focus on Islamic demands for a unilateral Israeli withdrawal from Judea , Jerusalem , Samaria and the Golan. Iran and Syria will be invited to the conference. Israel will not.The sheer brazenness of the American treachery is staggering. The treachery was on Israel's part for not taking the Bekaa Valley last summer despite numerous hints in public (many more and more direct in private I'm sure). Syria said it would have to get involved if Israel took the Bekaa. Iran said it would come in too. Sure it would have hurt Israel much more than the war did because of unpreparedness (a lot more dead soldiers). However, it would have rid Israel of two very big problems at little extra political cost to America or Israel (America would have handled Iran, being closer to the scene of action). Now America is saying screw you. I think a new government could fix this. Tell me again why there aren't mass demonstrations against the government? Cell phones stopped working, the internet has been shut down, no one can find the time to organize, Israelis can't find the streets, or they think the current government is not bad enough to be worth political action? Bush wants the double crosser Olmert out of power and Likud back in power. Here is what I think happened: The deal was - Bush gets Israel time, Israel moves on Bekaa in an effort to goad Syria and Iran into the war. Olmert does the preliminary moves on Bekaa - recon, special forces, small unit action (company size), helicopter insertions, etc. to make it look like something was going to happen. However, no movement in strength ever happened. Olmert was just using the war to punish Hizballah. So finally Bush shut the war down. Olmert is too political (what if the Israeli people really find out how totally unprepared the Army is?) and too tactial. Swatting flies instead of burying the manure. If Israelis care about Israel, take to the streets in Israel. As an American all I can do is sit on the sidelines and cheer (or boo as the case requires and my understanding allows). Olmert is Israel's Jonah. Time to throw him overboard. Israpundit has another bit on American "treachery". Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 12.25.06 at 10:51 PM
Comments
Surpisingly enought the Israpundit guys would be considered a far right blog in Israel. On top of that the piece quoted was written by an American. It does sound an awful lot like a lefty screed written by a rightwinger. Anonymous · December 27, 2006 02:25 AM Anonymous · December 27, 2006 02:25 AM is me. Simon M. Simon · December 27, 2006 02:27 AM One of the most interesting things for the raids and bombing that Israel *did* do in the Bekaa is that it was, actually, able to do them in what was considered 'the most heavily defended air corridor on the planet'. Now, since I am not a conspiracy theorist, that really does leave you with a few basic options: 2) None of the Israeli jets could be targeted and shot at. Possible. Not likely unless it was... 3) Not manned or not armed or not there. Each of which has its own implications, but would all indicate Hezbollah teething pains in making the transition from terrorist organization to military organization. Really, a military is not a great terrorist organization and a terrorist organization is not a great military organization. You can be either, but it is very difficult to be both, especially with limited manpower and resources. And the earlier Israeli sudden flyovers for raids into Syria, bring up the question of just what DOES Syria have in the way of anti-air capability... or any conventional capability at all? And if their money isn't going to upgrade and keep up their conventional military, which they haven't done a new round of tank upgrades since, apparently the mid- to late-1980's or very early 1990's, then just where *has* it gone? Certainly not to air or anti-air capability. Iran more than adequately funds and equips most of Hezbollah, though I am sure Syria does some of that, too, what with supernotes to help extend cash funds. Perhaps into, WMDs? Israel knows far better than I do... but my guess is on that last. And the implications of a sudden escalation by Syria would also show its lack of conventional capability... and inabilitly to escalate in-depth. ajacksonian · December 31, 2006 08:19 PM A. Jacksonian, re: your piece on letters of marque. We do have modern day privateers. They are called lawyers. Don't laugh. Here is a typical example. There is lots more of this going on. For instance Americans sue Jordanian bank Or this one where the Saudis are being sued for one trillion dollars M. Simon · January 1, 2007 02:02 AM Such silly people. Abram/Avram/Abraham was the father of Ishmael & Issac which fostered Islam, Judaism & Christianity. We better learn to stick to-gether as blood is thicker than piss. Greed and Power has taken over. We are going no where, but back into the earth again. Memories fade quickly. My friends are of many faiths but none is stronger than my brothers in faith starting from Avram. I will soon be gone from Earth and had hoped we were unified. Peace to all With love Bruce Bruce · January 6, 2007 11:39 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2007
December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
More Problems On The Home Front
Palestinian Civil War Watch - 8 Duke Meets OJ Palestinian Civil War Watch - 7 Desolation Row Amazing Powers War Is Not A Physics Problem Last minute Barcelona non-photogenic photo op Happy New Year 2007 - Open Thread special occasions call for celebrations!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I've never heard of "Israpundit" before, so I can't think of a single reason to give a flying fig what he/she thinks.
Y'know, I'm getting sick -- way past getting sick -- of every pea-brained leftist in the developed world thinking it's OK to (well) pee on the USA. So, "Israpundit" -- such an original name! -- you got problems with this particular guard dog? Fine, get yourself another.