|
November 03, 2006
Animal farm observations
Here's a picture I took last week of chickens and ducks. While the chickens did not group together, the ducks moved about in a tight group, almost as if they were controlled by a single brain. Initially, this moving-around-together business struck me as more "stupid" than the randomized movement of the chickens. But then, we are talking about ducks and chickens, not humans. When I asked about the ducks I was told that predatory animals had recently raided the collective pen that holds the chickens and the ducks, and that the ducks had formed tight groupings since then, but the chickens hadn't. This made me wonder which are smarter: chickens or ducks? Not that it's an earthshaking question (especially with a national election looming), but the answer isn't exactly staring at me. Something about the ducks' tight groupings shortly after the predatory raid suggested intelligence to me in a way that the random behavior of the chickens did not. Various web sites assert that ducks are smarter than chickens, but they don't say exactly why. Ducks and geese are a lot more closely related to each other than either are to chickens, and I found a fascinating account of geese actually protecting chickens: As the weeks passed and the chickens grew to full size the goslings just kept growing, a part of the chicken flock but much larger, twice as big, with long necks and a waddle. And we discovered an interesting thing about geese, they are smarter than chickens, almost as smart as dogs, it seemed. They seemed less driven by predictable instinct, more prone to personality and individuality.The rest of the story is very sad, and I'd rather not dwell on it. But I think it's likely that if geese are smart enough to respond to threats like that and defend chickens, that ducks are probably smarter than chickens. In an anecdote involving alligators, another author asserts that ducks are smarter than geese: David & Jeff are a wonderful couple of guys who live in this big house on 36-acres in the midst of trees dripping with Spanish moss. They even have a pond with ducks. Unfortunately, they also have alligators right now, two of them, one a couple of feet long, the other four or five feet long. They used to have a few geese, too, but apparently, the ducks are smarter...It's hard to make a judgment from a single anecdote, and for all we know, the geese died defending the ducks, or else were singled out by the gators because they were a bigger meal. However, if you think about it, ducks have to survive on land or in water -- feats requiring multiple skills and more versatility. Plus, while domesticated ducks can't fly, wild ducks do quite well in the air. Not so with chickens. Even the domesticated chicken's ancestor, the Red Jungle Fowl, can fly only for short distances. Various hunting sites proclaims that ducks are smarter than we think. They've learned how to avoid human hunters. (It's interesting that even though their survival rate is poor, domestic ducks have managed to become pests in parks and lakes. I think such a feat would be inconceivable for chickens.) I think it's fair to conclude that ducks are smarter than chickens. Beyond that, I'm not feeling Orwellian enough to commit anthropomorphism. posted by Eric on 11.03.06 at 03:56 PM
Comments
No, I didn't think of that. But I was tempted to point out the time that the geese saved Rome! http://www.homeschoolblogger.com/Inklings/137202/ The Gauls had long been making plans to capture Rome and they thought of a clever plan to take the city with ease. In the dead of night, they sent a company of men to climb up the steep cliff and attack the city unawares. All would have gone well for them and in a few hours the great city of Rome would have been burnt to the ground, had not the sacred geese in the temple of Juno detected the presence of the invaders and set up such a ruckus of cackling and flapping that the Romans awoke to see what was the matter. When they saw the invading Gauls, they made an attack and as they far outnumbered the barbarians, they drove them entirely from the city. So was Rome saved, by cackling geese. Eric Scheie · November 3, 2006 04:50 PM There are chickens and there are chickens. We had Bantams, that were independent and wily, and also White Leghorns, that have been selectively bred into walking meat. We could butcher Leghorns right in the pen while they wandered around pecking at the corpses. Kill a Banty and it would be a week before you even saw another one. Lyssa d · November 3, 2006 08:43 PM I remember reading that the Romans - and some other cultures - used geese as watchdogs, as they were territorial and would make a lot of noise, and even challenge intruders. Robin Dinda · November 3, 2006 09:24 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The right to be irrational?
I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts art not codes?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I was expecting you to make some comment about geese being the "second amendment" of the avian world.