|
February 20, 2006
An otter disgrace!
A BBC story claims that the carelessness of cat owners in California is killing off sea otters like this adorable little guy: Seems reasonable enough. And this call comes from a genuine scientist: The Californian researcher has called for owners to keep their cats indoors. But the culprit, toxoplasma gondi, called a 'cat parasite' by the reporter, is no such thing, and the researcher's theory (presented initially as fact) doesn't seem to me to pass muster. It seems rather like a false inference: people are commonly infected while changing kitty litter, ergo cat feces is the culprit. Clearly then the feces of cats out of doors is flowing to the sea and infecting otters. But this, from the reearcher, tipped me off:
Eating infected birds or rodents? I thought it was a 'cat parasite,' or thatcats were necessarily the cause. What birds or rodents might be carrying toxoplasma gondi? As it happens, probably all of them: Toxoplasmosis is a common disease found in birds and mammals across North America. The infection is caused by a parasite called toxoplasma gondi and affects 10 to 20 out of every 100 people in North America by the time they are adults. At this point I'm beginning to wonder if sea birds--let's say gulls--might be infected. And I wonder too whether otters eat gulls. And don't you think gulls might be more populus where there are people and a steady supply of food? Maybe in populated areas, like the urban centers in California mentioned in the BBC article? That sounds more logical than this: Dr Conrad has found that otters are more often infected with the single-celled parasite Toxoplasma gondii near urban centres with heavy water outflow from the land. That's a lot of guesswork and not a lot of science. My skepticism has found confirmation in the following: Cats were accused of spreading toxoplasmosis to California sea otters and dogs were accused of spreading campylobacter bacteria throughout Britain in new studies released in early July 2002but while the allegations were quickly amplified by mainstream news media and picked up by anti-feral cat and anti-street dog activists, the research behind each study overlooked key dietary factors in the transmission of the diseases. But that was written in September ... of 2002! Can't the BBC check its facts and scrutinize the positions of lone researchers before reporting one person's agenda as the fruits of scientific research? It's shocking that the UC Davis researchers are still peddling this nonsense four years after publication of an inconclusive study and a virtual smackdown courtesy of Animal People Magazine. Neither I nor Animal People needed research grants to reach that conclusion. posted by Dennis on 02.20.06 at 07:51 AM
Comments
Wow great post... I hope u email them with this and update with a response... Harkonnendog · February 20, 2006 03:34 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Animal people? Aren't you setting up a judgmental opposition? I thought a pig is a dog is a rat is a boy!