|
February 09, 2006
singular wireless
I don't know whether to call this post "singular wireless" or "the singularity of being," but news like this makes me feel old: Researchers at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) weren't concerned with such weighty questions when they developed a chip that allows you to listen to an iPod using your forearm as the transmission wire for the audio signals. The chip was detailed in one of several presentations during a session called "Silicon in Biology" at the International Solid State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) here Thursday.Yeah, I know we're all headed for various forms of robotdom, but to see it happening, and realize that I'm just a bit too old to take full advantage of it is more than a little daunting. I say "too old" because while I'm only 51 and can expect to live maybe 30-40 years if I don't abuse my body to excess the way I once did, I will never have had the advantage that today's kids (probably including some of my readers) have. If you grow up with a technology that's meant to become part of you, it becomes a better "match" with your biological makeup than if you try to adapt to it after a life spent under the assumption certain things just can't be. Sure, I remember all the hippy-dippy "I-feel-the-vibrations-radiating-from-you!" stuff from the 1960s and 1970s. But that was largely drug induced fantasy. This is techological reality. Unless the NeoLuddites stop us, it will give new meaning to depictions of old, um, memes. Like this: And that's just for starters! (Of course, in light of the point I'm trying to make, the old guy on the right would probably have to be considered the recipient.)
All depictions are intended to be coincidental only, and bear no relation to anything real or imagined, or unreal or unimagined. posted by Eric on 02.09.06 at 08:09 AM
Comments
Actually, you might not have the wrong religion. The uproar over the Muhammad depictions originates from the same idolatry prohibition found in the Ten Commandments. Depicting God (Allah) is a greater offense than depicting Muhammad. Considering the attitude of hardline Islam towards music, though, what I did has earned me a thorough roasting in Hell either way. Eric Scheie · February 9, 2006 11:24 PM Now, if was brain to brain transference you would not hear the music, you would know the music. However, it wouldn't mean you'd be able to play that music, for learning how to play music on an instrument is a wholly different skill. Even if the knowledge of how to play it came along with the knowledge of the music itself. Why so? Because your muscles would have to be trained. Alan Kellogg · February 10, 2006 06:56 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Based on your brazen desecration of the above religiously important image I declare war on your country.
Oh wait. Wrong religion. Sorry...