Who will defend the morally bankrupt?

By cooperating with Chinese Internet censorship, Google has (as Glenn Reynolds says), "lost a lot of moral capital."

This makes it very tough for bloggers like me who might otherwise defend them against the use of copyright laws to thwart the free flow of information:

The WAN, which represents 18,000 newspapers and 73 national newspaper associations, said it would examine whether new standards and policies could be drafted to create a commercial relationship between publishers, search engines and content aggregators.

Mr O’Reilly singled out Google for criticism, saying: “As a general rule, Yahoo, MSN and Ask Jeeves seem more open to constructive dialogue. It’s only Google which seems to have this absolute view [that all information should be available for free].” Google could not immediately be reached for comment.

Mr O’Reilly likened the initiative to the conflict between the music industry and illegal file-sharing websites and said it was not a sign that publishers had failed to create a competitive online business model of their own.

The irony is that I'm sympathetic to Google's "absolute view" and I think the this country's founders would be too.

Google, unfortunately, does not extend its "absolutist" thinking to countries like China.

Which means they'll have fewer and fewer defenders.

posted by Eric on 02.01.06 at 07:52 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/3257








December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits