|
January 03, 2006
Not "true Muslims," say "true conservatives" . . .
As I think I made clear in the last post, not everyone supports moderate Muslims. Radical Islamists (and assorted left-wing ideologues) consider them Uncle Toms and sellouts. Perhaps it's because they dislike moderation in anything, but not everyone on the right likes the idea of moderate Muslims either. In a column calling moderate Muslims "a people without a religion," one Jen Shroder (writing at Alan Keyes's Renew America site) would seem to agree with Osama bin Laden that moderate Muslims are not "true Muslims": ....[T]he plight of the moderate Muslim is grave. As America slowly admits the enemy is true Islam, every effort must be made to embrace the moderate Muslim, not persecute them. The answer is not to blind our eyes and try to convince ourselves that moderate Muslims represent true Islam. They don't. Islam is defined by its holy books, and the holy books proclaim death to all who oppose it, even moderate Muslims. The answer is to live in reality, recognize the violence of true Islam as it rears its head, and ask moderate Muslims to reconsider. True Islam pronounces moderate Muslims as apostate, they are the "near enemies" in the Sira and without true conversion, they will be slaughtered right along with Christians and Jews. American Muslims need to take a hard look at what their Koran, in its entirety and true context, demands. They can no more denounce the method of Muhammad than Christians can denounce the sacrifice and love of God. I know, because as I battle with public educators for my children's religious freedom, I get angry, and God continually rebukes me for my anger. He reminds me of the sacrifice that Jesus Christ made for them as well, and I am constantly humbled.I think that's a very condescending view of moderate Islam, and I hope it stays on the fringes. Not only does this view grant moral authority to Osama bin Laden and his ilk, it ignores the fact of moderate Muslim countries like Turkey which have peacefully coexisted alongside non-Muslims for many years. Also forgotten is the fact that religions evolve over time, and that radical Islam -- a modern reversion to brutal medieval primitivism -- is increasingly being seen as an aberration by many Muslims, who are not religious ideologues but who only want to live their lives in peace and prosperity. I can't think of a better way to betray them than to declare that their "true" religion is the same as that of Osama bin Laden. I wonder how those few brave Islamic clerics who've denounced terror must feel to be told by American "conservatives" that they're not being true to their religion. Hmmmm..... I should add that don't like the over-use of quotation marks. But if I hadn't placed the word in quotes, people might say it wasn't fair to conservatives to call the Keyes organization conservative. But what does that suggest about "true" conservatism? Does anyone know what's true these days? posted by Eric on 01.03.06 at 03:00 PM
Comments
Hey, even conservatives have their loonies and fringe elements. We'd have them killed, but they have more guns, too. To be fair (if there is such a thing) much of this is simply saber rattling. There is a desire to dehumanize the enemy so that killing him is not damaging to the soul. It's part of war. It is something that has to be done or we risk forever scaring the men we send to battle. Grand Stand · January 5, 2006 07:47 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Thanks for posting this. As I've said before, these so-called conservatives are giving the Islamofascists exactly the war they want:
Forget the lame grammar in that sentence, and look at its central fallacy: a Christian fundamentalist defining his interpretation of his faith as the only valid interpretation; defining his most radical "enemies" (the fundamentalists of other faiths) as the only real alternative religions; and writing off moderates of all faiths as "hypocrites" and "liars" unworthy of respect -- even when they support his values! This tactic, to put it charitably, seems a bit counterproductive: unite the "enemy" religion by treating them all as one, while tearing one's own apart in relentless factional infighting over who "really represents" the One True Faith. (Another respondent to this post flatly asserted that "Catholics are not Christians.")
To put it more bluntly, this is precisely the sort of fight the Islamofascists want: a blind, vindictive global pogrom, in which all Muslims are equally forced to fight against the "crusaders," with no room for compromise, moderation, differing views, or decency of any sort coming to or from "the enemy."
I always knew Alan Keyes and his chums were stupid, but I didn't think they could be THIS stupid.