|
October 05, 2005
A tale of two schools (and two cities?)
The story of the Oklahoma University student who blew himself up illustrates a contrast of two extremes in what I'll refer to collectively as "reporting" for lack of a better term. At one extreme, there's the Knight Ridder school of not reporting the story at all. Not even the basic, known, facts. At the other extreme, there's the rumor-mongering and conspiracy theorizing by WorldNetDaily, NEIN, and assorted freelance conspiracists. Usually, mainstream journalism avoids the latter approach. This is supposed to be a matter of principle as well as practice. The rumor-mongering which characterized the New Orleans reporting, however, is a sharp departure, and although it has been severely criticized (even by the journalists who did it), there's nonetheless a disturbing trend towards self congratulation. For rumor-mongering! There seem to be no rules. At least, if there are, I cannot discern them. Why did New Orleans qualify for what I called "rumor laundering" (something more appropriate for WorldNetDaily), and yet the case of Joel Hinrichs does not? Is it because there were more victims and it was therefore a bigger story? Was it because MSM journalists reporting Katrina tried to imitate the blogosphere by engaging in a failed attempt wolf pack behavior? I can't say, but the inconsistency bothers me. As a blogger, I have absolutely no problem in examining any and all sources obtainable, including MSM reports, conspiracy theories, or outright rumors -- and freely discussing, debating, and debunking whatever it might be from whatever the source. I guess that's the standard blogosphere approach. Apparently, it will not do for those who deem it their job to lead people -- whether out of a belief that they possess superior knowledge, or out of a belief in the justice and rightness of their cause. Right now, the bottom line with the Oklahoma University student who blew himself up is that he blew himself up. In front of a stadium. As to why, nothing is yet known, but the simple fact that it happened is not being reported -- not in my town. Why do I suspect that if someone had blown himself up in New Orleans, Louisiana instead of Norman, Oklahoma, the story would have been treated differently? MORE: According to this report at Oklahoma's NewsOK.com (from Texas Rainmaker via Glenn Reynolds), Hinrichs attended a mosque. Regardless of whether that mosque is the same mosque as the one attended by Zacarias Moussaoui (as alleged in the video), the simple fact of his mosque attendance alone indicates that Hinrichs is probably a convert to Isam, and it would be highly relevant in evaluating his state of mind. Not only that, the report states that his roommate was a Pakistani. I hate to sound accusatory, but I'm beginning to suspect that there are ulterior motives behind Knight-Ridder non-reporting. And they're not pleasant to contemplate. MORE: Also via Glenn's link, Michelle Malkin reports that the national media is "still AWOL." (As I said earlier, if your goal is suicide, ammonium nitrate is overkill.) MORE: Speaking of "national media," is Drudge also AWOL? UPDATE: This Tulsaworld.com story would seem to provide independent confirmation that Hinrichs' roommate was Pakistani: NORMAN, Okla. (AP) -- The Pakistani roommate of a man authorities say died when he detonated an explosive device outside a crowded football stadium was led in handcuffs from a party shortly after Saturday's explosion, the head of an Islamic student group said.Then there's another odd statement from Hinrichs' father: The FBI said in a statement Tuesday that there is no current threat posed by additional explosive materials, that there is no known threat from anyone else related to the incident and that there is no known link between Hinrichs and any terrorist or extremist organization or activities.Is that really any way to reassure people? UPDATE: Bill Hobbs asks why the MSM is ignoring the story, and Gateway Pundit is continually following the story and updating links. So is Mark Tapscott, who continues to ask the questions that used to be asked in the days of real journalism. UPDATE: According to Explicitly Ambiguous, Hinrichs tried to enter the stadium -- TWICE: KWTV (Channel 9) News just reported that Hinrichs did have a ticket to the game and attempted to get into the stadium at two different entrances. He was refused at each entrance because he refused to let them search his backpack. Hopefully they’ll have something up on their website later.I don't see how much longer the MSM can continue to suppress this story, and I'd love to know why they're doing it. (For God's sake, with a system like this, if the country came under enemy attack, the only people who'd know it would be bloggers!) MORE: The video interview of Hinrichs' father -- with the "when pigs fly" remark -- can be streamed here. If that doesn't work, it's also listed at KFOR's web site. UPDATE: More recent information here. posted by Eric on 10.05.05 at 08:46 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2861 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A tale of two schools (and two cities?):
» Oklahoma Jihad, Redux? from protein wisdom
In a "shift" from his original position, Oklahoma University President David Boren, a former chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, is now refusing to describe the explosion as a suicide:Dustin Ellison said the student vi... [Read More] Tracked on October 5, 2005 12:03 PM
» Update on bombing in Oklahoma from cut on the bias
The president of the University of Oklahoma, David Boren, has made an interesting shift in how he describes the death... [Read More] Tracked on October 6, 2005 12:35 PM
Comments
The silence of Drudge on this story makes me suspect even more strongly a hush-up via the feds (Homeland Security seems most likely), just possibly for one of the right reasons, to lessen the likelihood that any case which can be made doesn't get totally compromised. Aristomedes · October 5, 2005 07:14 PM I'm sure a lot of bloggers would shut up (at least temporarily) if asked. There is also the possibility that disinformation is being spread, which is why I must remain skeptical until I see independent confirmation. A television station quoting an unidentified person does not make the report true. Why does even WorldNetDaily seem to have shut up all of a sudden? Eric Scheie · October 5, 2005 08:51 PM The Norman story doesn't serve the MSM goal of making Bush look bad, & threatens to make him look good, because it emphasizes his stress on the war on terror. jeff · October 5, 2005 10:14 PM You mean, war on terror bad, multicultural jihad good? Eric Scheie · October 5, 2005 10:38 PM Has anyone else notice that Hinrichs' father, Joel Hinrichs Jr., who has been making statements for several days now, has never appeared distraught or even surprised at his son's suicide? Dave · October 6, 2005 06:33 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"in what I'll refer to collectively as "reporting" for lack of a better term"
I noticed recently that the person who produced the garbage (echoed around the world) Brian T. of the Times-Picayune about conditions in and around NO, just post Katrina, is not identified by the rag as a 'reporter' or even 'journalist'.
It turns out that he is a "staff writer."
They do not disclose whether he 'wites' news, opinion or fiction.
I suppose we could accept their phrase or use some variation of 'fabulist.'
I, of course, use the word fabulist in its "pejorative sense."