|
September 08, 2005
ACLU where are you?
One of the reasons I came close to defending the ACLU recently is that I like to think that when the chips are down and government rides roughshod over people's constitutional rights, the ACLU can at least be counted on to do something. (Even if it's just making a little noise in the press.) In New Orleans, the doctrine of "A Man's Home is His Castle" has been completely abrogated and the government is removing people from their houses with force. Now they are additionally using force to take away their lawfully owned firearms. (Via Glenn Reynolds, who also links to Cam Edwards and Eugene Volokh.) It would be bad enough if this had been done -- under an emergency theory -- to save people from Hurricane Katrina, but instead, the government forces waited until it was safe for them to enter, and only then decided to use force to remove people from their homes. After, not before the emergency. Am I alone in thinking something is a little anomalous in the fact that nothing was done to evacuate these people in time to save them from the hurricane, but once that had past, the levees repaired and the water pumped out, only then was it time for door-to-door "rescue" -- at gunpoint? If this doesn't raise eyebrows of those normally in the business of defending constitutional rights, I don't know what will. Expecting to see some denunciation of these wholesale Fourth Amendment violations, I just visited the ACLU's web site, and I see nothing. Nothing about the illegal entries and searches without warrants. Nothing about confiscation of legal firearms without warrants or due process. Nada. They're kvetching about Roberts while expressing regrets on Rehnquist's passing, so it's not as if they're not updating the site. Should I look again tomorrow? Or is this another example of the ACLU's Second Amendment recalcitrance? Well, OK, suppose we give them the benefit of the doubt, and chalk it up to the fact that many of their contributors hate guns. What about the Fourth Amendment? If the ACLU has given up on the Fourth Amendment in addition to the Second, I'd say we're all in trouble.
(That video footage of the elderly woman being tackled is rather tough to deny, I'd say...) UPDATE (09/09/05): Still nothing at the ACLU website. However, Glenn Reynolds links to Dave Kopel, who just completely nails New Orleans Police Superintendant Edwin Compass (who declared without authority that "No one is allowed to be armed" and "We're going to take all the guns") -- along with anyone assisting his illegal orders: The Compass order appears to be plainly illegal. Under section 1983 of the federal Civil Rights law, any government employee who assists in the illegal confiscation would appear to be personally liable to a civil lawsuit. Moreover, higher-ranking officials--such as the National Guard officers who have ordered their troops to participate in the confiscation--would seem to be proper subjects for impeachment or other removal from office (and attendant forfeiture of pensions), depending on the procedures of their particular state.I saw Compass on TV earlier tonight on CNN, lying blatantly to Anderson Cooper about the buses. First he said there weren't enough, and blamed Bush. Then, when the questions persisted, he admitted that they'd been flooded but that it was too late to use them. He refused to discuss the particulars of the forced "evacuations." Too bad this isn't slapstick comedy. (I'm not in the mood to laugh right now.) First they ordered a mandatory evacuation which they failed to carry out despite a huge yard full of perfectly good buses. Next, when people were flooded and desperate, they were not allowed to leave the city and the Red Cross was prevented from helping them. Finally, with the water pumped out and the emergency beginning to subside, residents are forced to leave and subject to illegal door to door searches and illegal firearm confiscation. I hate to sound so cynical, but with government actions like these, who needs hurricanes? And where was the ACLU? posted by Eric on 09.08.05 at 10:27 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That was a rather unexpectedly gracious eulogy to Chief Justice Rehnquist, but, ideologically, the ACLU is a defender of individual rights only very selectively and very haphazardly today. The Second Amendment doesn't exist as far as they are concerned.