|
July 26, 2005
A clean start?
I have been busy configuring my new toy, and it's a time consuming process, because I bought it used. (Such a deal!) Anyway, I'm not given to following trends, so after my last MP3 player conked out for the last time, instead of buying a new Apple Ipod, I decided to buy a Creative Nomad Zen. A close friend has one, and I've played around with it enough to know that it's an excellent, versatile, light-weight machine. (Well, light-weight enough for me! Some of these things are too light, and they make me nervous.) More than one reviewer has rated the sound quality higher than the Ipod, but considering that most of what I listen to was originally recorded in the late 1950s, even if I had the original fidelity of the masters, it wouldn't come close to what's recorded today. What's taken a lot of time is that this used player has a 30 gigabyte hard drive which arrived two-thirds full (that's 3,756 songs, to be exact), and all I wanted to do was put all my music in there and organize it into three or four groups, so there'd be nothing else to distract me. That way, if I hit the wrong button, I wouldn't be listening to stuff like this. Remarkably, much as I hate "felon rap," I'm now wondering whether I've become some sort of felon by having it in my possession! Seriously, the way they write laws these days, it wouldn't surprise me if I committed 3,756 crimes simply by my act of buying a used MP3 player. (Another reason I hate lawyers.) Without getting into too much detail, the hypothetical law school exam question for the day is: how do I "do the right thing?" Will any of my readers be willing to pay my bail? I promise to be good and never buy any used electronic equipment again! UPDATE: Techdirt links to this New York Times piece in which writer John Schwartz confesses to similar multiple felonies: Kenneth Chang is a colleague who recently sold me his iPod. After just a few months, he needed one with more storage.Whoa! This is serious crime we're talking about here. And it gets worse. Although the writer admits to a certain amount of moral squeamishness, he clearly doesn't understand the profoundly heinous nature of his slide into a life of crime: ...eavesdropping on Ken's iPod worried me. I have read about people randomly plugging in to each others' iPods to figure out what songs are in their friends' heads, or even in the heads of strangers. (They call it "podjacking.") But this was a mind meld.A five year stretch in the federal pen ought to give him something to fret about! Imagine. Prison time for possessing music you never wanted and don't even like! The world is getting crazier and crazier. posted by Eric on 07.26.05 at 10:46 AM
Comments
Like it or not, most people will copy other people's music one way or another. They always have. There's a basic problem with trying to limit what people can hear, and that's that anything we can hear we can record. I'm old enough to remember the uproar over audio cassettes and VCRs. It seems there's a direct relationship between advances in technology and kneejerk opposition grounded in "preserving the status quo by any means necessary." Criminalizing technological developments will not work. These stringent laws only lend themselves to selective enforcement -- meaning a few hapless individuals will draw lengthy prison terms. Eric Scheie · July 27, 2005 07:28 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I think that if the RIAA had their way, songs would automatically erase after 1 (maybe 2) playings. Or you'd have to send a request in triplicate to Copyright Central whenever you wanted to listen to something, and they'd send you a 64-character key that you'd have to type in before each listening.
You're right - it's crazy.
Consider: The standard iPod can hold "up to 15,000 songs" (I didn't know there were that many). You can get each one for 99c, making a chock-full iPod worth up to $14,850.
My choice of "song" involves "Die Meistersinger" and Mahler Symphonies, so I'd probably only get 1500 "songs", but the cost would probably be about the same.
Does anybody have replacement insurance on their iPods? Or is this a market opportunity?