|
June 24, 2005
The victory of the quagmire?
Via Jeff Goldstein, I see that Ted Kennedy is in high dudgeon over, over... Well, over a quagmire: "I'm talking about misjudgments, gross errors and mistakes. Those are on your watch. Isn't it time for you to resign?" Kennedy asked. "Our troops deserve better, the American people deserve better. They deserve competency and they deserve facts. In baseball, it's three strikes and you're out. What is it for the secretary of defense?"Today's Philadelphia Inquirer features as its front page headline, "General: Enemy in Iraq unbowed" and quotes General Abizaid: "I believe there are more foreign fighters coming into Iraq than there were six months ago" and that "in terms of the overall strength of the insurgency, I'd say it was the same as it was" six months ago.If enemy strength is the same as six months ago despite the fact that more foreign fighters are coming in than six months ago, is that evidence of a quagmire? If it is true that despite an influx of more fighters, the enemy has the same strength, that would indicate ever-diminishing returns. For the enemy! How is that a quagmire? If anything, more coming in than six months ago means they've been getting killed at an ever faster rate than before. Let's assume, though, that even having the enemy replaced as fast as they're being killed constitutes a quagmire. Does that mean that the best way to stop the quagmire is to stop killing the enemy? That would work, and it would certainly end all talk of a quagmire, because the enemy's numbers would increase, and without anyone to kill them, doesn't that simply mean the enemy would win? In whose interest is that? Let's play Guess what? I'm tired of this war too. Does that mean we should consign Iraq to Vietnam "quagmire" status, followed by defeat? I have friends who were very antiwar in those days who think we should, and I've also seen Vietnam veterans against the war who've been quoted extensively on Iraq. What I was suprised to see, though, was a report in USAToday that Vietnam veterans serving in Iraq see an "entirely different war": If there are parallels between Iraq and Vietnam, these graying soldiers and the other Vietnam veterans serving here offer a unique perspective. They say they are more optimistic this time: They see a clearer mission than in Vietnam, a more supportive public back home and an Iraqi population that seems to be growing friendlier toward Americans.I admit my bias, but I attach more credibility to these guys than the quagmire-talkers. There's more, but I'm struck by the apparent failure of the Iraqi "insurgents" to win over many hearts or minds -- either in Iraq or in the U.S.: "There was a lot more action in Vietnam than there is here," says Chief Warrant Officer Herbert Dargue, 57, of Brookhaven, N.Y. But the danger in Iraq is higher for those who are shot down but survive. "There's no such thing as a POW," he says, referring to the terrorists' penchant for executing Westerners.Plenty of people -- soldiers, Americans, and even Iraqis -- still think we are "doing the right thing." But others want "the quagmire" to lead to "the end." How do they want it to seem? UPDATE: Here's another view of the insurgency -- from Michael Yon in Iraq: The insurgents here are not trying to topple an established and oppressive government. The converse, actually--they are trying to prevent a new democratic government from gaining a foothold in the sand. The zealots employ proven methods of past insurgencies by engaging in operations that destroy the economic infrastructure and destabilize and discredit the government, thereby undermining its ability to govern. While the insurgents have seriously hindered the process of reconstituting Iraq, the new government is getting stronger by the day, making insurgency a game of diminishing prospects. The insurgency does not appear to be weakening, but the government is definitely getting stronger. (Via InstaPundit.)Again, if the insurgency is a game of diminishing prospects, I'd say that the "quagmire" is more meme than reality. UPDATE: Much more discussion here, particularly about the wide disconnect between the troops in Iraq and folks like Linda Foley and the quagmire club. posted by Eric on 06.24.05 at 08:20 AM
Comments
Steven you made me think of a joke to which the answer is, "Honey, we'll cross that bridge when we get to it!" Eric Scheie · June 24, 2005 07:04 PM With all the talk of quagmire and being bogged down in Iraq, you would start to think that this is not a country that is mostly desert! mdmhvonpa · June 24, 2005 11:34 PM It was the Garden of Eden before the Satanic United States arrived! Eric Scheie · June 24, 2005 11:43 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The idea of Chappaquiddick Ted having the gall to criticize anybody else's "misjudgements, gross errors, and mistakes".... "That's water under the bridge," said Teddy.
His brothers John (assassinated by a Communist) and Robert (assassinated by a "Palestinian") would be ashamed of him. He's on the side of the enemy.