|
May 24, 2005
Saving a spammer? Are you kidding?
I don't usually comment on spam, but this morning I received an unusual form of spam: an email complaining about a very typical form of spam which is probably familiar to most readers: Dear Mr. [Name Deleted],Well, I've seen spam in the name of Allah, spam in the name of Jesus, spam resorting to flattery, illness, spam claiming honesty, but this is the first time I've received a spam attacking spam. Or it it spam to complain about spam to all the people whose names were gleaned from the spammer's list? Most likely, the new spammer would disagree that this new unsolicited email constitutes spam, because no money is being solicited. Does that change anything? It's still an unwanted email, and I'd be willing to bet that some people would dislike it more than the original spam. Does that matter? Isn't it free speech? What bothers me about this is the supreme foolishness involved. It's one thing to take spam so seriously as to write to all the people on the spammer's email list. But actually praying for the soul of the spammer? What could be less important than the soul of a spammer? They belong in Hell, and I'll never be caught praying for them. Even if I did such a foolish thing, I'd keep it to myself. I'm not going to dignify the email and create more spam by answering it, nor will I use the reverend doctor's name. But why would anyone would do such a thing as pray for a spammer? I don't mean to attack anyone's religion, but is it reasonable of me to ask whether (assuming a belief in God), if you are going to bother God by invoking his name in prayer, it shouldn't be about important things? Spammers are simply criminals and con artists who do not mean what they say. Sure, spammers shouldn't invoke deities, but it's just the way they are. Insincere and dishonest, like millions of other crooks. I can't think of a group less deserving of prayer. But is praying for the spammer really the reverend doctor's point? I don't know, but I suspect that the spammer is only the ostensible audience, and that the intended audience consists of the people who were targeted by the original spam -- people who are now told that some eminently forgettable slimebag who harassed them deserves prayer because he invoked Jesus. Spam only begets spam. Without invoking the name of Jesus, isn't it enough?
(text of original spam) DIVINE REVELATION posted by Eric on 05.24.05 at 09:33 AM
Comments
We pray for the souls of spammers (when we're being good and conscientious) that they will come to know the error of their ways. The original spammer is doubling his sin by invoking the name of Christ to rob people - so this guy will be in a world of hurt when he's gotta look Jesus in the eye. An eternal world of hurt. Prayers for thug and scum souls accomplishes the following: If answered - if the vermin is open to it - he stops being a thug or scum, and the world becomes a better place. If the former thug is lucky and/or smart and/or blessed, he receives punishment in this (temporary) world instead of the next (eternal)world. & if the prayer is unanswered - if the thug is too entrenched in his vile ways - then the prayer will add some additional lumps of coal to his head in the hereafter. You're not kidding yourself that we'd be praying for mercy or success for this guy, are you? You sweet little innocent thing. Well - take what I say about Christianity with a grain of salt. I'm a Christian, but sometimes rather a lousy one, at least by conventional standards. Truth is, knowing from hard experience how embarrassing it is to turn to Christ and then realize what a jackass one has been, plus having that vindictive streak that is part of the natural woman, I get a kick thinking about the mental agonies spammers will through if they ever acquire a conscience. Me, I'd give the good reverend (spammer b?) the benefit of the doubt and figure he just got brand-new shiney internet access and email, and doesn't know about 'reply' vs 'reply-all.' Happens more than you'd think. If the rev sends a second one that's anything but an apology, I will pray for the reverend's wretched soul. Cheers! Persnickety · May 24, 2005 03:03 PM Go and Spam no more? Gary and the Samoyeds · May 24, 2005 08:39 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
A spammer? Hmmm....