|
May 16, 2005
NPR is more exciting than you think!
I just received the following email from Iranian writer Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi (recently interviewed by Jamie Glazov): Hello Everyone,Intrigued by this, I went to NPR's site, and found a rather bland description of the interview: From Mujahadeen to the Movies: SalahuddinYawn. A disgruntled American expatriate who once fought the big bad Russians and now likes to act in films. What on earth could the fuss be about? I did a little digging through my usual far right sources, and finally settled on the extremist New Yorker. The man is in fact a cold blooded assassin who admits to gunning down a member of the Iranian opposition here in the United States, for which he was paid $5000. His philosophy is, well, murderous (but polite enough for public radio): On the street in Tehran, Salahuddin looks more like a visiting Islamic scholar from Qom than like a murderer. He is about six feet tall, has a closely cropped beard, and wears a knee-length tunic. "Generally, I blend in," Salahuddin said earlier this year. "I could be an Iranian Arab or an Iranian Baluch." He is a cordial, soft-spoken, and, it seems, even-tempered man. Yet he has declared that he is ready to kill again, "in certain circumstances." He also approves of bombing buildings if, in his opinion, they are "symbols of arrogant American power."Here's his description of the murder: In conversations that took place over five days in Tehran last February, Salahuddin admitted to murdering Tabatabai. "I shot him," Salahuddin said, with no sign of discomfort or remorse, when I asked him about the killing during our first meeting. In a later e-mail, Salahuddin insisted that there was nothing "murderous" in his killing of Tabatabai. "It was an act of war," he wrote, and a religious duty. "In Islamic religious terms, taking a life is sometimes sanctioned and even highly praised, and I thought that event was just such a time." Some interpretations of Islamic law allow for killing when it is seen as a way to protect the Muslim community, and Salahuddin seems to have appropriated this view for his own ends. He was, by his own description, an "angry and alienated" African-American with "a good dose of rage with the American establishment." He told me that if the opportunity to kill Tabatabai had not come along, he is sure that he would have done something else like it, or something on an even larger scale. "I was primed for violence, and I thought about cratering the White House a quarter century before Al Qaeda did," he wrote to me. "It would be accurate to say that my biggest aspiration was to bring America to its knees, but I didn't know how."The guy's a case study in human psychopathology. Here he imagines how it would feel to assassinate Henry Kissinger: I asked Salahuddin what he thought he would have accomplished by assassinating Kissinger. "It's like this—you deal with a bully," he began. "You go to school the first day, a guy takes your lunch money, and that's going to go on every day of the year until you do something to him that will discourage that kind of behavior." He added that even though he knew there was "an excellent chance" that he would get shot by Kissinger's bodyguards, he was prepared to go ahead. "I don't see myself as being in love with danger," he wrote in an e-mail, but "the excitement of it is a psychic drug and in the midst of potential life-and-death circumstances you understand what it is to be alive."Fun to read if you're the kind of person who enjoys reading about Gein, Gacy, Manson.... The way NPR wrote up this interview, I'd have never known they were interviewing such an exciting character. I wonder how they'd bill an interview with Charles Manson, anyway. posted by Eric on 05.16.05 at 10:48 PM
Comments
So that means Salahuddin is right? Eric Scheie · May 16, 2005 11:08 PM Hey there! You're plagiarizing sources without attribution! The text above was lifted verbatim from this piece: http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=6058 If you want to plagiarize, I'm going to have to ask you to do it on your own blog. This is getting dull. Eric Scheie · May 16, 2005 11:15 PM Way to get self-righteous, Eric. That way, we won't notice the amoral position that you hold on international affairs. What's that called? Sublimation? David Howe · May 17, 2005 09:40 AM I do thank you for giving me just the sublimely self-righteous loophole I needed. You're too kind! P.S. I wish you wouldn't tell my readers about my amoral "position," though. (Personal sexual topics are, well, embarrassing.) Eric Scheie · May 17, 2005 01:37 PM "I wonder how they'd bill an interview with Charles Manson, anyway." NPR's Mike Shuster profiles Charles Manson, a former cult leader born in the United States who has lived in prison for most of the last 30 years. Manson is thought to have persuaded young women -- mostly young, thing Californians -- to ruin the day of a promininet director in the late 60's. aldahlia · May 18, 2005 02:53 PM NPR is taxpayer-financed Communist radio. I'm glad I don't listen to it. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · May 23, 2005 05:30 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Newsweek report on Quran matches many earlier accounts
Contrary to White House assertions, the allegations of religious desecration at Guantanamo published by Newsweek May 6 are common among ex-prisoners and have been widely reported outside the United States, RAW STORY has learned.
Several former detainees at the Guantanamo and Bagram airbase prisons have reported instances of their handlers sitting or standing on the Quran, throwing or kicking it in toilets, and urinating on it.
Where the Newsweek report likely erred was in saying that the U.S. was slated to acknowledge desecrating the Quran in internal investigations, and in relying on a single anonymous source to make grave allegations. But reports of desecration are manifold.
One such incident—during which the Koran allegedly was thrown in a pile and stepped on—prompted a hunger strike among Guantanamo detainees in Mar. 2002, which led to an apology. The New York Times interviewed former detainee Nasser Nijer Naser al-Mutairi May 1, who said the protest ended with a senior officer delivering an apology to the entire camp.
"A former interrogator at Guantanamo, in an interview with the Times, confirmed the accounts of the hunger strikes, including the public expression of regret over the treatment of the Korans," Times reporters Neil A. Lewis and Eric Schmitt wrote in "Inquiry Finds Abuses at Guantanamo Bay."
The hunger strike and apology story was also confirmed by another former detainee, Shafiq Rasul, interviewed by the UK Guardian in 2003 (James Meek, "The people the law forgot," Guardian, Dec. 3, 2003) It was also confirmed by former prisoner Jamal al-Harith in an interview with the Daily Mirror (Rosa Prince and Gary Jones, "My Hell in Camp X-ray World Exclusive," Daily Mirror, Mar. 12, 2004).
The toilet incident was reported in the Washington Post in a 2003 interview with a former detainee from Afghanistan.