|
May 12, 2005
I take back everything I've said in this blog! So hire me!
Here's something which ought to be obvious to anybody, but which apparently isn't. Your blog can actually be read by anyone -- including prospective employers: Cell phone callers connect with one person at a time while bloggers put their lives on the Internet for dozens to follow. Some of the online diarists document everything from their carnal cravings – mostly for sex, drugs and alcohol – to bad breakups and skirmishes with authority figures.What I'd like to know is, how many people possessed of sufficient intelligence to start a blog don't realize that the Internet is public? It's not as if this is a confidential process. Hell, even email isn't confidential. But a blog? It's about as public as you can get, and it can get more public at any time, without warning or notice of any kind. The interesting thing about about this kind of "being public" is that you have no real way of knowing if or when it will happen. When Classical Values was featured on CNN, I not only had no control over it, but had a commenter not told me about it I might never have known. Is there a distinction to be made between a political/cultural blog written by a cynical middle aged attorney and the types of blogs often created by young students? People have told me that there is, and that it really wouldn't be fair to expose both types of blogs to the same level of public scrutiny. The problem is there's no way to avoid it. Today's high school student is tomorrow's congressional intern, and his juvenile blogger life can well be expected to be searched and researched to discover anything of possible interest to the scandal-obsessed culture. It's easy for me to say that I wouldn't want to work for anyone who didn't like my blog. But that's something for the kids and their parents to think about. (Gee..... What would I do if I ever had kids?*) * Doh! I'd simply demand that the federal government pass laws to prevent them from being able to read this blog. What a no-brainer. UPDATE (05/13/05): St. Lawrence University has sued these anonymous bloggers, demanding that Time Warner Cable (the owner of Blogger.com) divulge the bloggers' identities. While I am unfamiliar with the litigation, it illustrates that anonymity is about anonymous as "confidentiality." posted by Eric on 05.12.05 at 11:09 AM
Comments
Even if I didn't do what I do, I'd still stay anonymous on my blog. Never know when something can come back and bite you in the ass. Alexa · May 12, 2005 05:34 PM True enough BD, although there are a couple of things worth keeping in mind: 1. It is not wise for pseudonymous blog writers to live under an illusion that it's impossible to discover their identity. All it takes is the will -- plus a private investigator (i.e. a little cash). 2. Truth is always a defense to libel actions. Eric Scheie · May 12, 2005 05:37 PM A small-time blogger that I read pretty regularly recently started a whole new blog & deleted the old one just to make sure his name was wiped from the internet. As for myself, I challenge anyone to Google "John Beck" and identify which of the 141,000 search results pertain to me. Beck · May 13, 2005 10:39 AM I don't think it's possible to wipe one's name from the Internet. I thought my name was unusual, but there are at least two other "Eric Scheie"s -- and one of them has a family member who mistakenly complained to me about my blog. Obviously, I stole my identity from myself! Eric Scheie · May 13, 2005 11:13 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's very simple. Don't attach your name to anything you wouldn't say in public. With Internet anonymity, you can easily have a psuedonymous blog, and those blogs, *because* of the psuedonyms, aren't taken as seriously as those blogs that are written under your name.
Of course, you also have to be circumspect in your comments, like not mentioning that you work at the McDonald's at Garfield and 12th in Springfield, and then complaining about the managers. Simply saying, "man, my job at ClownBurger sucks big time because of the Man" gives the same information without being specific. And you should probably know libel law, at least enough to stay out of trouble. (You can say "Clownburgers suck" but not "Clownburgers suck because they put roadkill in them." The second is actionable.)