|
March 14, 2005
"A grandmother in her 50s"
At least, that's how the petite (5'1") woman assigned to guard former linebacker and martial artist Brian Nichols was described. Which brings to mind Dennis's last post about bullshit. Why does bullshit seem to always get smeared across the headlines? I can think of many characterizations which might manage to find their way into a headline about That's what stared me in the face in today's Inquirer as I simultaneously read Dennis's post: Views differ on accused Atlanta killerWhat evidence is presented about the man's alleged "goodness"? Well, there's this, um, inability to "understand": "We're trying to understand this whole thing," Nichols' sister-in-law, Felisza Nichols, said from her home in the Fort Lauderdale, Fla., suburb of Plantation. "Why did this happen? His character is completely opposite to what is going on."His character? Reading that, I expected to see at least an attempt at a tale of a hint of goodness -- possibly an account of an honor student who'd suddenly lost it and just flipped out in court last week. Instead, there's this: Nick Pergine, who played football with Nichols at Kutztown, said Nichols' massive physical presence and martial-arts skills earned him a reputation as someone to be careful around.Try as I might, the "good person" just isn't staring out at me. In fact, I see no evidence at all, save the statement by Nichols' attorney that he was "surprised." But "good person" makes the headline. Let's return to the tale of the tiny grandmother, and how she fared at the hands of this "good" man: Until Friday morning, Nichols, a 6'1" 210 pound former college football line backer and computer consultant, was in jail and standing trial for his alleged kidnapping and vicious assault on his former girlfriend. When returning Nichols to his jail cell from court on Thursday, jailers searched his shoes and found that he had smuggled two "shanks" or knife-like weapons from his jail cell into the courtroom. When advised of this, presiding Judge Rowland Barnes ordered additional security for Nichols' court appearance on Friday, however, he was nonetheless allowed to be alone that day with 5'1", 51-year old sheriff's deputy Cynthia Hall.Remember, this all started because they locked this ferocious athlete in a holding cell alone with the tiny unarmed grandmother. (More in a moment on that; it's being downplayed.) Now, the grandmother's family is justifiably upset that no one was there to protect Mrs. Hall: A sister and a family friend of Fulton County Deputy Cynthia Hall say they are concerned about the fact that she was the only one guarding Brian Nichols before he allegedly attacked her.You're damned right it doesn't make sense to lock this man in a cell with a 5'1" unarmed woman. The family is rightly outraged. She should not have been there. I know this is politically incorrect, but what happened violates the most elementary common sense. Would we expect a Chihuahua to successfully protect us against a rabid Rottweiler? (I'm afraid calling the Rottweiler a "nice doggie" wouldn't be enough either.) We come to the issue of whether Hall was armed or whether she should have been armed. I've been reading repeated accounts like this -- which make it appear that Nichols wrestled the gun away from Hall -- implying that she shouldn't have been armed. ATLANTA — On Wednesday, when Brian Nichols returned to jail from his rape trial, sheriff’s deputies found a pair of crude weapons in his socks.But she didn't carry the handgun into the locked room! Not according to a video captured by hidden cameras installed in the holding area: At 8:48 a.m. on Friday, Hall took a handcuffed Nichols from the detention area at the bottom of the downtown Justice Center Tower and put him in an elevator to take him to an eighth-floor holding area. There, Nichols was to change into his civilian clothes and resume a rape retrial before Superior Court Judge Rowland Barnes.If I didn't know any better, I'd say it looks like they didn't trust small grandmothers to carry guns into the holding area. Why? Because there'd be nothing to stop guys like Nichols from snatching them away and doing exactly what he ended up doing. This whole, bumbling fiasco would almost be comical if it weren't for the tragic loss of life involved. Unthinking bureaucrats wrote the rules which placed the tiny grandmother (and everyone who died) at risk. Now they'll rewrite the rules again. I am sure they'll refer things to a committee. Maybe even a committee to study the results of the committee. And then a Commission! Maybe even a "Blue Ribbon Commission." (Dennis, please shut up about bullshit!) Of one thing you can be sure: common sense will not be considered. I'll therefore conclude with a few questions for the Commission as they ponder the "bad choices" which "led to tragedy" for a tiny grandmother and a "good person": Stay tuned. (I don't know if I can stand to stay tuned, as I'm reminded of the many hours I spent sitting on committees . . . ) MORE: Reading the most recent account I can find, it's still not being made clear whether or not Nichols wrestled a gun from Hall, later unlocking the cabinet and stealing another gun belonging to her, or whether she was unarmed, and he stole her only gun. From what I am reading, it appears that Hall was unarmed while in the holding area -- but that might be wrong. (I haven't seen the video, but if Nichols already had the gun, why bother to unlock the cabinet for a gun?) AND MORE: Yet another report does little to shed light on the status of Hall's gun: "Common sense says you lock up the gun in the lockbox, but policy and common sense aren't always the same thing,"said another deputy with long experience in courthouse security.Policy and common sense aren't always the same thing? I'd say they're becoming antonyms. . . posted by Eric on 03.14.05 at 08:47 AM
Comments
Great minds? I can't hold a candle to Rachel Lucas, but thanks..... Anyway, stories like this die when they cease to be useful to the political ends of those who report them. Eric Scheie · March 15, 2005 06:46 AM As a lawyer, I insist that political correctness has gone too far. The law insists on the absolute equality of men and women. Nature tragically disagrees. Assigning one female deputy to that suspect with knowledge of a predisposition to violence was at the root of that fiasco. There are certain functions in society that women just cannot perform as well as men, and we must accept that. I watched as a pair of cops, a male and female, took down a violent suspect. The male was desperately grappling with this large bully while the woman cop was delicately spraying mace in his face, getting him only more violent. Women policemen, firemen, soldiers, sailors, etc., should be relegated to duties that they are physically suited to perform. Billions are wasted each year trying to assert an equality that just doesn't, and shouldn't, exist. Ask any male cop whose partner is a female if he really feels he has adequate backup. -- Bernard Lehrer, Ventura Bernard Lehrer · March 25, 2005 11:51 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I suppose great minds think alike, and within the same time frame. Rachel Lucas posted about another aspect of the story that smelled like bullshit to her, a mere 14 minutes after your post.