Less than a shilling . . .

Is Glenn Reynolds shilling for Phil Bredesen (by writing favorably about him in the Wall Street Journal)?

Under the circumstances, I hope so. Consider the following from the National Review's Jim Geraghty:

Phil Bredesen is a Democrat who has won in the South, obviously. By 2008, will Democrats be seriously seeking a member of their party who has demonstrated an ability to win in a red state? Of course, he faces reelection in 2006.

Would any Democrat be devious enough to help Hillary by running a primary challenge against him?

I'd say Bredesen needs all the shillings he can get!

(It might not be a shilling, or even a farthing, but it's my two cents worth.)

posted by Eric on 02.10.05 at 01:13 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1990






Comments

As a Tennessean, bredesen's strengths are that he's not part of the lunatic left and doesn't cater to him.

He's also pro-gun. This is a guy who passed shall-issue class 3 into law.

SayUncle   ·  February 10, 2005 02:13 PM

Pro-gun, shall-issue, that sounds good to me.

The post by Stephanie Estelle Xayananh on Murray S. Davis's Naturalist-Jehovanist-Gnostic spectrum, and how it ties in with the Smith-Anderson spectrum, is now up on Up with Beauty. Two more to go in this particular series on spectrumology, one and then one BIG one.



December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits