|
|
|
September 28, 2004
The unstoppable Keyes juggernaut!
Pennsylvania's moderate incumbent Senator, Republican Arlen Specter, is facing a new threat, not from his own lackluster opponent, but from Barack Obama! Much as I prefer Barack Obama to Alan Keyes, I wish Obama would stay the hell out of the Pennsylvania senatorial campaign: Barack Obama is running to represent Illinois in the U.S. Senate, but yesterday he worked Philadelphia like a hometown candidate, helping to raise $100,000 and headlining a rally that drew more than 500 people.While moderate incumbents are usually considered "safe," Arlen Specter has been getting it from the right, from the left, from an alliance between the right and the left, and now, from a senatorial candidate in another state. The losing candidacy of Alan Keyes is bad enough for the Republican Party. (Keyes is 40 points behind in the race against Obama, and is plagued by a social issue he could have left alone, yet went out of his way to raise). But when his opponent -- in his first race for Senate -- doesn't even need to bother campaigning, and instead runs around campaigning in other states, that adds insult to injury. It wasn't idle talk when I spoke of a loser mentality plaguing the Republican base. It is one thing for Keyes to damage the Republican Party in Illinois. But why should he be allowed to damage Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania? Surely there ought to be a loss limiting rule -- prohibiting losers from causing damage outside their own areas. I don't mean to be facetious (and I know that what goes around comes around) but seeing a tantrum by moral conservatives in Illinois affecting the candidacy of a moderate in Pennsylvania just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I thought all politics was supposed to be local! Of course, since when losers have losers minded dragging others down to defeat? (On the other hand, not wanting to be a downer can lead to self-censorship. Which is why I have hundreds of unpublished screeds......) posted by Eric on 09.28.04 at 08:50 AM
Comments
You're right, Eric--still and all, does Hoeffel really look viable? The party operatives on both sides are after Specter, but do the voters see any reason to go for Hoeffel? I'm obviously not there to see and hear the ads, but to judge by his web presence and what I hear from relatives, he hasn't made much of an impression outside his (admittedly important) Congressional constituency. Sean Kinsell · September 28, 2004 10:06 AM No. I don't think that there is a compelling reason for most Pennsylvanians who regularly vote to vote for Hoeffel over Specter this time. From my peripheral attention to this issue, it seems unlikely that Hoeffel will be able to distinguish himself from Specter on any basis except for partisan ones. Here is one way that I see advantage Hoeffel: Democratic groups are attempting to register huge numbers of African-American voters in urban areas of swing states. Pennsylvania and Ohio are two areas that I have seen mentioned in this context. If the Dems are successful, they might be able to give Hoeffel a substantial ride on party coattails. But for voters who are already registered and have been voting for Specter for years, why switch? That doesn't seem likely. bink · September 28, 2004 10:44 AM I agree with you. I oppose all these attacks on Senator Arlen Specter, both from the Democrats and from Republicans like Keyes. I hope Senator Specter wins. He is the kind of man we need. But Keyes -- "lackluster"? I must say that he is anything but lackluster. He is extremely interesting. He is my enemy, I totally oppose him, I oppose his _moral premise_. I am selfish and proud of it. I admire and defend homosexuality and homosexuals, the sanctity of homosexual marriage. But I must still say that Keyes, like Bork, Santorum, etc., is at least _interesting_ as an adversary. They do at least deal with the most fundamental issues, even though they are on the wrong side. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · September 28, 2004 05:08 PM Thanks everybody. (And I do like Specter.) A couple of points. Steven, I didn't mean to say Keyes was lackluster; only that Hoeffel was! I'll grant Keyes this: he searches for the truth. I do too, only my search brings me to a very different place than Keyes's. Searching for truth is no way to win, though. Accomplishing the latter requires tempering the truth through the severest tests of cynical realism, as well as taking a broad general view of things.... Eric Scheie · September 29, 2004 11:34 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Laughing at the failure of discourse?
• Holiday Blogging • The right to be irrational? • I'm cool with the passion fashion • Climate change meltdown at the polls? • If you're wrong, then so is God? • Have a nice day, asshole! • Scarlet "R"? • Consuming power while empowering consumption • Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Specter is a good guy.
I bet his life is Hell right now, though. The new Republican Party nomenklatura is making sure that he doesn't side too strongly with Snowe and Chafee and the other "Yankee" Republicans. The left is just loving how he squirms.
The problem is that Specter is a good Senator and that he has been an effective representative for the people of his state.
His choices now are either to 1) swing right and embrace values and policies that are essentially foreign to Pennsyvlanians or 2) try to keep a hold on the center. The Republican power masters are making sure he doesn't do 1) and the Democrats are trying their hardest to make sure he doesn't do 2).
Too bad. I like the guy.