|
April 13, 2004
Divide and conquer?
Via Little Green Footballs, I found a very thoughtful article by Theodore Dalrymple: When Islam Breaks Down. An excerpt: My historicist optimism has waned. After all, I soon enough learned that the Shah’s revolution from above was reversible—at least in the short term, that is to say the term in which we all live, and certainly long enough to ruin the only lives that contemporary Iranians have. Moreover, even if there were no relevant differences between Christianity and Islam as doctrines and civilizations in their ability to accommodate modernity, a vital difference in the historical situations of the two religions also tempers my historicist optimism. Devout Muslims can see (as Luther, Calvin, and others could not) the long-term consequences of the Reformation and its consequent secularism: a marginalization of the Word of God, except as an increasingly distant cultural echo—as the “melancholy, long, withdrawing roar” of the once full “Sea of faith,” in Matthew Arnold’s precisely diagnostic words. There's much more, and I can't do justice to the entire piece, but I want to add a few words about the Reformation. The freedom that we tend to take for granted in the West did not flow naturally from any of the doctrines of Luther, Calvin, or their nemesis Loyola; it was an unintended consequence of the ferocious religious warfare during the Reformation. Not only do people tire of religious war, but scientists and artists can avail themselves of the freedom created by the power vacuum which always occurs when those who would rule must instead battle it out. The result -- religious pluralism -- was intended neither by the proponents or opponents of the Reformation, but it became permanent, and paved the way for the modern realization (eventually articulated by philosophers of the Enlightenment as an "idea") that religion is one thing and government another, and that freedom means the right to be left alone in matters of conscience. Islamist scholars in my opinion made a major mistake when they attributed Western success to "The Reformation" and then posited that Islam needs a Reformation. The essence of Wahhabism does precisely that; it is an Islamic Puritan Reformation -- right down to the stark, bleak, white buildings and the stripping of ornamentation. They are having their bloody "Reformation" right now. In Islamic terms, a "reformation" can only be imposed from the top down, and could never countenance dissent or liberalization. I suppose that in the event of a prolonged struggle between Sayeed Qutb-style puritans and more moderate ("corrupt") Muslims, a sort of war-weariness could result in more freedom. But another stage in the modern struggle has already been set -- and it's between the forces of sex and rock 'n roll and traditional Islam. Thus the modern Islamic "Reformation" is happening on two fronts -- whether they know it or not. Ask any Iranian kid with a modem! (And let's not forget the cherished values of "DEMOCRACY, WHISKEY, SEXY!") Dalrymple concludes on a surprisingly optimistic note, Islam in the modern world is weak and brittle, not strong: that accounts for its so frequent shrillness. The Shah will, sooner or later, triumph over the Ayatollah in Iran, because human nature decrees it, though meanwhile millions of lives will have been ruined and impoverished. The Iranian refugees who have flooded into the West are fleeing Islam, not seeking to extend its dominion, as I know from speaking to many in my city. To be sure, fundamentalist Islam will be very dangerous for some time to come, and all of us, after all, live only in the short term; but ultimately the fate of the Church of England awaits it. Its melancholy, withdrawing roar may well (unlike that of the Church of England) be not just long but bloody, but withdraw it will. The fanatics and the bombers do not represent a resurgence of unreformed, fundamentalist Islam, but its death rattle.I certainly hope he's right. And while I know many would disagree with my assessment of the Reformation, if I am right it is entirely possible that Islam is exhausting itself as it fights not only the traditional puritans-versus-the-corrupters war, but is simultaneously undermined by the insidious notion of freedom. Freedom happens when no one is watching. Just don't expect them to believe that freedom comes from God. Their god doesn't believe in such things. posted by Eric on 04.13.04 at 11:50 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|