Twelve year old stalker?

I am having a fascinating time with calls from what sounds like a twelve or thirteen year old boy who calls my cell phone from untraceable numbers. He leaves angry messages of a sexual nature, and just the other day asked me whether I prefer bananas or apples. (I told him that the answer is complicated, because while a banana must be peeled, an apple must be cored. After heavy breathing, he said, "You amaze me!" and tried to steer the conversation into sex. I asked him for his phone number and he gave me an incorrect number. Doubtless I'll hear from him again. But I don't feel like playing online sex games with him, and the fact that his sex talk consists of skillful hinting just shy of the real thing makes me think he's working for professional people. Um, maybe people who think they're professional.)

No one except close friends have my cell number, and because of the nature of the calls, I am assuming that the "boy" (who sounds quite bright) is working for someone who does not like me, but who is too cowardly to identify himself, herself, or theirselves.

Did you ever wonder how strangers can obtain your cell phone number?

It's simple.

M-O-N-E-Y

At this online investigative service anyone can pay $190.00 to obtain anyone's cell phone number.

This wouldn't be the first time someone has tried to rattle my cage in this manner, and while I think this is fun, because I think it may relate to my blog, I decided to write about it here.

I have noticed that when people do not like you, they will rarely tell you. If they have a disagreement, often they won't state it. They play anonymous games. They'll do shit like leave dead animals on your front doorstep (it's happened to me several times), and in general make you think that someone doesn't like you and you'd better be careful.

Careful about what? Like watch what you say? Stop speaking your mind? The hell with that! I'll say whatever I damn well want, whenever I want.

This is my blog, and if people don't like what I think, they can go pound sand.

I suppose if I really wanted to get paranoid, I could worry about being killed, but cowards like this aren't likely to kill. Besides, nothing I say is original enough, important enough, or widely read enough for someone to want to kill me for it.

For now, it's just fun and games!

Maybe I should suggest the kid's sponsors read this. (It discusses the war against opinions which are considered offensive.)

Once again, opinions -- no matter how offensive people might find them -- are not conduct.

For example, my opinion is that sex with minors by an adult is child abuse. The lower the age of the child, the more heinous it is. But the line between childhood and adulthood is not engraved in granite. In ancient Rome, children were allowed to marry at age fourteen. (I think that's too young -- but again, what difference does it make what I think?) If someone doesn't like my discussing it, well too bad!

If I were to say that wife-beating and child-beating are moral equivalents, would that be considered offensive? If, echoing some of recent posts at other blogs, I opined that physical violence can be more damaging than sexual intercourse (as well as more traumatic), would that be offensive speech?

Why? It's just an opinion -- either right or wrong. I am not trying to dictate morality to other people, nor am I threatening them. I would no more beat a child than I would have sex with a child. I guess that in itself could be considered offensive.

Ain't it a strange world?

posted by Eric on 02.15.04 at 05:45 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/764






Comments

You're right that they are cowards. But what you write _is_ original and important or _I_ wouldn't be reading you constantly. Thank you. And to Hell with them.

Steven Malcolm Anderson   ·  February 16, 2004 03:50 AM

Caller: Young kid.
Blogger: Older gay male
Topic: Kid steering the talk toward sex.

Sounds like a classic police set up to me. But maybe I watch too much TV. I'd be careful though.

Michael Demmons   ·  February 16, 2004 02:22 PM

Michael, I am surprised at you! Didn't you know that in a free country, "the innocent have nothing to fear"?

;)

(Not only am I monogamous at the present time, I am not sexually interested in anyone who appears too young to smoke cigarettes! Fishing expeditions without evidence are prohibited by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, so I would love nothing more than to ascertain that a police agency was behind this nonsense. I could use the money!)

Eric Scheie   ·  February 16, 2004 02:47 PM

Hey! I'm just sayin!

Michael Demmons   ·  February 16, 2004 03:15 PM

Anytime, Michael.

:)

I wrote the post in part to get such input -- and in part because it occurred to me that as this blog is the most radical thing going on in my generally boring life right now, there might be some connection.

Although what underaged sex has to do with this blog, I do not know. (Perhaps someone wants to provoke me into a logical analysis of that hot-button topic. It's too much of a distraction, and unrelated to the issue of consensual sex between adults.)

Eric Scheie   ·  February 16, 2004 03:40 PM

And Steven, I think you're right. To Hell with them! (People engaged in such antics belong there....)

Thank you!

Eric Scheie   ·  February 16, 2004 03:41 PM

Eric, why would you even talk to this, um, individual? Maybe there really is temptation in that whiff of prurience.

Alan Sullivan   ·  February 19, 2004 06:31 PM


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits