|
January 28, 2004
Yeeeaaagh! Time to crash?
Didn't Howard Dean perform a remarkable imitation of the classic Confederate "rebel yell"? That last link (a blog called "Rebel Yell") links to an intriguing musical rendition of Dean's "Rebel Yell" by Lileks. Here's another blogger (from Vermont), who spoke of "Southern disComfort." But to be fair, Joshua Micah Marshall gave Ashcroft credit for the term a few years ago. Beats me; I am only trying to be fair. And balanced. Many bloggers (as well as innumerable commenters) have called Dean's "Eaaggh" the Rebel Yell. I can't possibly list them all, but I tend to agree with a sentiment repeated in that last blog: As Dave Winer said to me earlier today on the phone, the media is trying to "delete" the Dean campaign. Much as I personally enjoyed the Rebel Yell fun, I think Dean got a bum rap -- and there was a good explanation (called "worth reading" by Glenn Reynolds) for the yell itself. The contrarian in me (as well as the lover of lost causes) likes Howard Dean more and more. I particularly hated that sleazy New York Times smear against his wife. While not much of a Howard Dean supporter, I know a hit piece when I see it. And the Times article was a classic hit piece. Author Judi Wilgoren, by the way, is a past expert at hit pieces.... They had the bad camera angle, the nasty personal innuendo, and they made Dr. Steinberg (about whom I've heard nothing but good things) appear glum and aloof, if not weird. (You have to pay for the article now, unfortunately.) What was she supposed to do? Abandon her practice and go to Iowa to smile at the cameras? That the attack comes from the left made it far more hypocritical. I mean, I could have imagined certain Republicans complaining that Dr. Steinberg is not living up to someone's idea of a "role model," but this? I doubt Abraham Lincoln could be elected president today -- not if they decided to smear his wife. On top of that, there was also the cleverly timed, phony domestic abuse report about one of Dean's state troopers. Why, they even used Watergate language to sex up the piece -- "What Did He Know About Abuse Allegations; When Did He Know It?" (Via Andrew Sullivan.) Couldn't they have used "Troopergate"? Or was that taken? And why did so many pundits keep making the Freudian slip (well, it is a form of sexual innuendo) of calling him John Dean? (Now there's a real smear for you!) This whole thing has been a lesson in the fickleness of voters. It shows how easily manipulated people can be. That's democracy, sometimes. The streaming link was sent to me in an email along with a caption titled "Union Civil Engineers should never impersonate mechanical engineers..." Well, so much for the North, and for Union Civil Engineers. But what about impersonating Confederate Civil Engineers? I think some of them may be on thin ice down there....
And anyone who wants to hear an actual rebel yell (recorded in 1935 by a 90 year old Confederate vet) can stream it at this link. posted by Eric on 01.28.04 at 11:04 PM
Comments
I like Dean more than ever now. The more the media tell my I'm supposed to hate somebody, the more I'm inclined to like him or her. And, conversely, the more they pump somebody up as a "saint" (such as that fake, phony, fraud "Mother Teresa"), the more I'm inclined to dislike or detest that person. I probably said this before but, seeing those pictures of "Wildman" Dean on Dean Esmay's blog makes me wish I was a man's man so I could really go for him. What a MAN! Steven Malcolm Anderson · January 29, 2004 02:39 PM Speaking of Dean, I've just _got_ to tell you this story I once read back in the early 1970's: When General William F. Dean was being released from a Communist prison camp in Korea, the Chinese Communist psychologist who had been trying to break him said to him: Dean. Howard Roark asked: "What is the principle behind the Dean?" Howard Dean. Dean Esmay. John Dean. General William F. Dean. "The Gloomy Dean" (Dean Inge of Canterbury, G. K. Chesterton often fisked him). Dean Freeborn (kid I knew in high school, he's a farmer). Steven Malcolm Anderson · January 29, 2004 09:22 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
When Howard Dean became the frontrunner, I worried that conservatives would tear apart his wife for being Jewish and for their children being raised Jewish (since anti-Semitism is still alive and well in some parts). Instead, most conservative commentators have given Judith Steinberg glowing reviews, while so-called "feminists" and "liberal" female commentators have torn her to pieces. Maureen Dowd and the shrew crew managed to make Ann Coulter appear moderate for a few seconds there.