|
|
|
January 05, 2004
The ideal versus the practical?
In response to my post on Michael Demmons' welfare remarks, I received a thoughtful email. I just replied to it, and it seems fair to share this with other readers. (The following is somewhat abbreviated.) EMAIL TO ME: Been looking at your blogs here and there. Re: the poor and stupid drain us all - I have a lot of sympathy with the get-off-your-ass-and-work philosophy, but I really believe that some people are not nearly as bright as others. People Can help themselves if they're merely ignorant, but Stupid people are Stupid, they can't help that any more than you can help the color of your skin. I agree that even most Stupid people can be trained to do Something, but someone has to be there to get them going in the right direction - just like a child - and watch over them, just like a child. Do we as a society let them live in misery simply because their parents abandon them? Do we sterilize everyone with an IQ of less than 100? MY REPLY: I do worry about the lowest common denominator (of the stupid) becoming the standard to which we are all reduced. Sterilization strikes me as a grotesque violation of human rights, but so does forcing person A to subsidize person B. Where does it end? Charity ought to be voluntary, but then, I don't think anyone should be allowed to starve. The truly stupid-to-the-point-of-helpless need to be cared for, but the fact that some people are more stupid than others should not obligate the smarter to take care of the dumber.I suppose I should also add that because the welfare system has been in place for many decades, it cannot simply be terminated abruptly without provoking horrors possibly worse than the welfare system itself. Slavery was an evil far worse than welfare, but the country exploded over the suggestion that it be terminated, because there was a vast status quo invested in the institution. So, as a pragmatist, I hesitate to base my thinking solely on whether something is right or wrong. It is possible to recognize the wrongness of something yet acknowledge that starting a civil war over it compounds the wrongness. Once again, this returns to the distinction between the good and the right, and (as is so often the case where ways of thinking collide) there are no easy answers.
For me, it stood out like a piece of rare art, and so I had to quote it. Many people agree with Michael, but would never dare say so. posted by Eric on 01.05.04 at 05:35 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/654 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The ideal versus the practical?:
» WHO SHOULD GET GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE? from DiscountBlogger
Back to my socialism thing. Obviously, I have a problem with the government performing services for people who won't fend for themselves. I make exceptions for people like children, who are the victims of cruel parents. But here's where I... [Read More] Tracked on January 6, 2004 08:32 PM
» QUOTE OF THE DAY from DiscountBlogger
From the comments section to this post at Classical Values:"Selfish capitalists like Bill Gates or the "Robber Barons" of the 19th century did far more to create wealth and jobs for the poor than have all the Mother Teresas..."Mother Theresa... [Read More] Tracked on January 7, 2004 08:03 PM
Comments
Ayn Rand wasn't against charity to the poor, the sick, the handicapped. She was against the idea that that is the primary virtue, superceding all others. She was against the idea that it is somehow _better_, more virtuous, to be poor, sick, helpless, than to be rich, healthy, strong, able. She was against the idea that beauty, glamor, and achievement are to be renounced in the name of pity. She was against the idea that, if you see a blind man, you should poke your own eyes out in order to be "equal" to him. She was against the idea that if you do something for your own profit, material or spiritual, if you have a selfish motive of any kind, then your act is somehow morally less worthy than if you do it out of guilt. Steven Malcolm Anderson · January 7, 2004 02:05 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Laughing at the failure of discourse?
• Holiday Blogging • The right to be irrational? • I'm cool with the passion fashion • Climate change meltdown at the polls? • If you're wrong, then so is God? • Have a nice day, asshole! • Scarlet "R"? • Consuming power while empowering consumption • Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Eric,
I haven't yet heard the end of it!!!
And to your email correspondent:
The "stupid" can work on a road crew, spreading asphalt and digging holes. That's who those jobs are for.
(No offense to the smart people who take those jobs because they pay well.)