Does zombie equity lead to blasphemy diversity?

Quick question.

Is a Zombie Jesus more offensive than a Zombie Muhammad?

I mean, they are probably both considered offensive depending on whom you talk to. But it seems as if the New York Times is more willing to belittle religious objections to the Zombie Jesus than they would be to belittle objections to the Zombie Muhammad. In fact, correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m not sure the Times would even write a piece about people who pissed off neighbors with a Zombie Muhammad.

Are some blasphemies more equal than others?

 


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

6 responses to “Does zombie equity lead to blasphemy diversity?”

  1. Man Mountain Molehill Avatar
    Man Mountain Molehill

    Jeebus was a racist. Who’s this White Ed Sepulcher they keep talking about?

    Anybody who gets up out of a tomb and walks around complete with spear wound in his side has to be a zombie.

  2. Cephus Avatar

    Blasphemy is really a foolish idea, we enjoy free speech in this country, it doesn’t matter who gets offended by said speech, we still enjoy it and nobody can do a thing to stop it. That doesn’t stop the loony left from giving it their best shot though.

  3. Man Mountain Molehill Avatar
    Man Mountain Molehill

    You can’t blaspheme something which doesn’t exist. Watch this:

    Zeus is a pedophile, Apollo is a limp-wristed, epicine, prancing fruitcake and plays lyre off key. Hera is just a complete slut. Hephaestus snores. Ares smells. I’m not even going to repeat what they say about Melpomene.

    So, what about that imaginary cross god? Turned any water into wine lately?

  4. captain*arizona Avatar
    captain*arizona

    at least christians aren’t burning young girls at the stake anymore except in africa. bill maher and mike malloy are right religion sucks! islam is not liberal and should be attacked not defended.

  5. Randy Avatar
    Randy

    Is a Zombie Jesus more offensive than a Zombie Muhammad?

    This is a trick question, right?

    No doubt the NYT is more likely to belittle a Christian’s complaints than they are a Muslim’s. The problem isn’t that they are willing to dismiss Christian complaints. The problem is their willingness to placate any Muslim complaints of blasphemy as labeling them as culturally insensitive. Typical Left-wing double standards in action once again by the NYT and from much of the Left in general.

    The Left is always trolling the public. For instance, over the last several years it’s been a usual occurrence for some Left-of-center publication to put out pieces denigrating Columbus Day or Thanksgiving Day as celebrations of the genocide of native American populations.

    But this year with the ME refugee issue ongoing, they wrote stories of how our ancestors who came to these shores were religious refugees. So one year the fact that Europeans migrated and conquered the western hemisphere is bemoaned, a year later, for purely political purposes, the European genocide is morphed into European refugees. Go figure.

    If it weren’t for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.

  6. captain*arizona Avatar
    captain*arizona

    why don’t one you heroes put a zombie muhammed in your front yard ???