Common courtesy and rules of the road are for the little people

Some drivers on the road are making it very difficult for other drivers, and an incident yesterday made me feel as if I was being turned against my will into a raging bigot. I don’t want to hate people, mind you. But there was this Prius driver who was in front of me on a major commuter through street which winds for a couple of miles, and he was going waaay slower than the speed limit. Irritating was not the word. Thoughts flashed through my mind as I tried to come up with logical explanations for this behavior. There is an ever-growing segment of the driving public which I think is best called “unmotivated drivers.” These are people who just don’t seem to have the normal human interest in getting from Point A to Point B in the most efficient way possible. When I was a kid there were far fewer of them, and they were often called “Sunday drivers.” Not that such driving was limited to Sundays (although I guess in the really old days gramps would take his Model T out for a Sunday drive with nowhere to go and no reason to get anywhere), but these days there are a lot of people who don’t seem to have any major interest in going anywhere. Hell, I even read that a growing number of young people don’t want to drive, and they aren’t interested in getting drivers licenses. While that might be abnormal behavior by my old-fashioned standards, I’m actually glad that people who don’t want to drive are not driving. The world needs fewer unmotivated drivers, not more.

But back to yesterday’s driver. My inner bigot wanted to find the right pigeonhole for him, but I was not sure whether he fell into the category of distracted driver or unmotivated driver. He was in my way, and I became more and more curious as to what made him think he had a right to be so inconsiderate of other drivers like me and the drivers of the cars behind me, whose primary goal on the road actually is getting from Point A to Point B as opposed to yakking on the phone, Googling, catching up with email, or directionless idiots cluelessly awaiting instructions from the GPS AutoFuhrer on whether and where to go and whether and where to turn.

It occurred to me that this asshole might believe he was saving the world, and that driving at a snail’s pace was making some sort of statement. I then noticed that he had a Washington DC license plate. Looking further for clues, I also saw a Harvard University decal on his rear windshield.

HARVARD!

OK, now some of my best friends went to Harvard (no, they really did!), so I don’t want to smear the place.  But since I’m in a very rare true confession, admit-to-my-inner-bigotry mode, I think I should point out that I have seen a certain mindset among many (not all) Harvard people, who seem to believe that a Harvard degree constitutes an entitlement to tell one’s inferiors what to do. (Unfortunately,  “inferiors” in their context means all the little people who didn’t go to Harvard, which is a lot of people.) There’s just an entitlement mentality that goes with the place, plus a certain outlook of superiority. Yet many of those guys couldn’t change a frigging tire. They are not superior people, and in some ways they are inferior to some of those they look down on, and I think this leads to feelings of insecurity, which only heightens the desire to rule. So, when I saw a Harvard decal coupled with a DC license plate, the Harvard ruling class stereotype was triggered. “What might the man be doing in Ann Arbor?” I asked myself. And why, I wondered, isn’t he more motivated in his approach to going about doing it?

Now, this inexplicably slow driving wouldn’t normally have merited a blog post, not even when coupled with a DC plate and a Harvard decal. Because after all this is Ann Arbor, and the place is populated with all sorts of incompetent drivers. Between students who are still learning to drive and professors who have still not learned how to drive (or consider such ugly realities beneath them), it can be maddening to drive here, and if I complained about bad driving every time I saw it, there wouldn’t be anything else on the blog, and there’d be no end to my complaining.

But here’s what really got my attention. The unbearable slowpoke rolled right through two stop signs — without even slowing down. And no, he did not appear to be drunk or on drugs, as I saw him craning his head as if he was looking to see whether people were coming. The unbelievably selfish nature of his driving astounded me, as he clearly cared nothing for others on the road, yet at the same time seemed to not really want to get to where he was going. It seemed to me he was exuding an attitude which said “driving is for the little people, and I am above such trifles!”

But yet still, something did not compute until I spoke to a friend this morning who told me about a ghastly new practice called “hypermiling,” and who suggested that might have been what this Prius driver was doing. Apparently, the sadists who engineered the cars decided (thoughtlessly, IMO) to install a gadget that tells people when they are using the least amount of fuel. And these “hypermilers” are people who deliberately drive very slowly and don’t stop at stop signs because they either want to save gas or save the world or both. I’ms surprised I’d never heard of this, but it’s hardly new:

You probably assumed that the painfully slow car in front of you, inching toward the glowing red stoplight a half-mile away, was another distracted driver talking on his cell phone. Impatiently waiting while he coasted along, you had no idea that you were stuck behind a “hypermiler.”

Just what is a hypermiler?

Hypermilers are drivers of both hybrid cars and regular vehicles who go to extraordinary lengths to get as much as they can from each gallon of gasoline, trying to surpass the EPA’s estimated fuel economy ratings. The terms “hypermiler” and “hypermiling” originated in the online communities of Clean MPG, which is devoted to raising fuel economy and lowering emissions.

So that’s it! My tormentor was a Harvard hypermiler from Washington out to save the world and save money doing it. Altruism and selfishness combined. Aided and abetted by an obsessive compulsive personality, no doubt.

Needless to say, these greedy and unselfish saviors of the world are road hazards:

Police and automotive experts say over-the-top attempts by some drivers to boost their gas mileage could be endangering them and other motorists.

The AAA and Connecticut State Police are warning against extreme measures in “hypermiling,” a practice in which unusual techniques are used to boost vehicles’ mileage.

They include rolling through stop signs to avoid braking, turning off a car’s engine or shifting into neutral to coast down hills, over-inflating tires to decrease rolling resistance against pavement, and other techniques.

One action that authorities say is particularly dangerous is called “drafting,” tailgating big rigs in hopes of cutting wind resistance and being pulled along in a truck’s wake.

“Every one of them is illegal,” Connecticut State Police spokesman Trooper William Tate said of the “hypermiling” techniques.

“But more importantly, they’re extremely dangerous. Every one of them is the cause of accidents,” he said.

Most accidents on secondary roads are caused by drivers who don’t obey traffic signals, such as stop signs or traffic lights, Tate said. Most highway crashes are caused by tailgating and unsafe lane changes, which are often related, he said.

Stop signs and traffic signals are for the little people! As to other drivers, no true environmentalist would care at all about other drivers. Even humanity is a thing to be regretted.

Sooner or later, perhaps one of them will collide with one of the many bicyclists who also do not believe in stop signs and traffic signals.

Think of the carbon footprints that could be saved.

AFTERTHOUGHT: If I sounded like I was comparing GPS users to Nazis, I guess I got carried away. I am sorry to all who might have been offended, and I especially apologize to Mike Godwin.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

14 responses to “Common courtesy and rules of the road are for the little people”

  1. Simon Avatar
    Simon

    Overall it seems like a good way to keep gasoline prices down. As long as the hyper drivers stick to killing the hyper bicyclers.

  2. Sigivald Avatar
    Sigivald

    “Every one of them is illegal,” Connecticut State Police spokesman Trooper William Tate said of the “hypermiling” techniques.

    Well, most of the ones listed are.

    But even in CT I don’t think it’s illegal to “overinflate” your tires.

    (Indeed, while significant overinflation is a bad idea since it makes them easier to damage, even non-hippie non-idiots should maintain proper inflation.

    It really does reduce rolling resistance.)

  3. TMI Avatar

    I can still out-accelerate any Prius on the road.

    Yes, I do pass, even in residential areas.
    .

  4. Scott M Avatar
    Scott M

    Many people see their car as an extension of their living room. It’s their cocoon and we are just distractions in it. You see these people gently and slowly roll onto the interstate at a leisurely pace and immediately head for the farthest left lane (less distractions and more time for the phone) and they won’t budge until 3 inches from their exit. At which point they cut across 4 lanes of traffic to exit.

    Driving is something people do with the CPU cycles leftover after they do everything else. Your life isn’t on their radar screen.

  5. bob sykes Avatar
    bob sykes

    He did violate the law twice in your presence. You should have called 911 and reported him for running stops signs.

    Also, how do you know he wasn’t drunk? He was driving erratically. Excessive slow driving is, in fact, something drunks do. Turn him in on suspicion. At least the cops will go looking for him and interview him.

  6. T Avatar
    T

    I sympathize and empathize with you predicament. There is no excuse for running stop signs.

    However, having been behind slow moving vehicles many times myself, we do need to remind ourselves that speed limits are upper limits, not required motoring speeds; drivers do have a right to drive more slowly, although one would hope not excessively slow and not without pulling over occassionally to allow vehicles to pass(and NEVER in the left passing lane of a four lane highway).

  7. John S. Avatar
    John S.

    I know that you’re factually correct in that “speed limits are upper limits,” but if that’s the case, then they should set the speed limit as the speed at which you’re quite likely to crash and die, rather than the speed that they prefer you’d travel. As long as speed limits are set artificially low, I’ll treat them as the “minimum acceptable speed.”

  8. John S. Avatar
    John S.

    I forgot to mention that speed limits are often (if not usually) set artificially low so the state can suck additional money out of the driving populace.

  9. Sigivald Avatar
    Sigivald

    What Mr. March said.

    Modern speed limits (off of side roads in the city or suburbs, at least) are almost never based on safety, but politics and income generation.

    The Interstate Highway System is designed to be safe to drive at speeds significantly exceeding most posted limits.

  10. Captain Ned Avatar
    Captain Ned

    @Sigvald:

    The Interstate Highway System was designed for 80 mph speed limits based on auto tech of the late 1950’s. Extrapolate that to today’s cars and they should all be autobahns. The problem is that modern driving tests are based on city driving and parallel parking, so it’s no wonder why we’re stuck with ridiculous limits on the Interstates.

  11. Richard Avatar
    Richard

    I suspect there are a variety of causes for this problem. DWO is definitely one of them especially in sunbelt areas. I got stuck behind someone driving 15 mph under the speed limit IN A CORVETTE.

  12. bob sykes Avatar
    bob sykes

    As a civil engineer, I need to address the comments on speed limits above.

    First, speed limits are not set arbitrarily anywhere,Interstate, urban or rural. There is a well-established set of guidelines developed by the US DOT and adopted everywhere as a condition of receiving the federal gas tax monies.

    These criteria are based on traffic density and traffic type, and include considerations of likely vehicles and pedestrians. Lots of pedestrians reduce speed limits. Sight distances, degree of curvature, road grade and off-road hazards also enter into the limits.

    Every speed limit and every posted sign is recommended locally according the the criteria and is approved at the state level.

    There is no attempt to create speed traps.

    The original Interstates were designed for 70 mph, but many modern routes are designed for lower speed limits. A lot of the earlier state turnpikes (which have been incorporated into the interstate system) were designed for 60 mph.

  13. Donna B. Avatar

    Bob Sykes – I wish I could believe you that there is no attempt to create speed traps, but I don’t. Consider I-20 in eastern Alabama. I first drove it in 2004 and have driven it every year since.

    There’s quite a long stretch of it that was obviously brand new in 2004 where the speed limit was 55. Since there were still orange construction barrels around (but no equipment or personnel) I figured they just hadn’t got around to changing the speed limit signs.

    Well — the 55 mph speed limit signs were still there in Feb. 2012.

    Oddly enough, closer to Birmingham where there is major road construction, mountains, curves, heavier traffic, etc… the speed limit is still 55 for most of that section. There are several miles of that roadway that should be lower.

    Also, consider I-10 in New Mexico. The speed limit does arbitrarily change ever so often for “safety zones” where fines are increased.

    Perhaps civil engineers don’t recommend speed traps, but local and state legislatures don’t have a problem with them at all.

  14. Rich Avatar
    Rich

    I think Thomas Sowell oce wrote something like: ” In a free country, everyone can drive as slow as they like – but not in the fast lane.”.